NABE Conference Announcement: Dallas, Feb. 15-17, 2012

November 9th, 2011 | bilingual education, Conferences and Conventions | Comments Off

 Please join us in Dallas, TX for our 41st Annual Conference!
 February 15-17, 2012

BILINGUAL EDUCATION: Celebrating 41 years of Educational Excellence in Reforming, Renewing and Achieving Equity through Bilingual Education and Biliteracy for All

The NABE conference is the largest gathering of parents, teachers, administrators, policy makers, future teachers and professors dedicated to serving bilingual and English Language Learners in the United States.

Our annual meeting has expanded beyond the field of bilingual education to include 21st Century Learning, Title l , Title lll , Pre-school, Dual Immersion, Foreign Languages, especially the critical languages, Englishas a Second Language, Sheltered Instruction, Heritage Language Programs, and other approaches for multi-lingual students from pre-K to grade 16.

NABE conference attendees have institutional purchasing power. Many are responsible for procuring the full range of educational materials, products, and services for use in linguistically and culturally diverselearning environments.

Our four-day conference will feature:
- More than 2,000 attendees
- Internationally renowned keynote and featured speakers
- More than 200 featured and concurrent sessions
- A major product exhibition and job fair

NABE 2012 attendees will include:
- School administrators, superintendents, and board members
- Teachers, future teachers and other instructional personnel
- University-based researchers and teacher-trainers
- Parent and community leaders
- State and federal policy makers
- News media representatives
- International representatives

REGISTER ON ON-LINE (CLICK HERE)

DOWNLOAD REGISTRATION BROCHURE  (CLICK HERE)

DOWNLOAD EXHIBITOR/SPONSOR BROCHURE (CLICK HERE)

 

http://www.nabe.org/conference.html

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Alabama Radio Host Embarks on 14 Day, 14 City Walk to Encourage Cross-Cultural Dialogue about HB 56

November 9th, 2011 | Alabama Immigration Law: HB 56 | Comments Off

For Immediate Release:                                                Contact: Pili Tobar
November 8, 2011                                                           (305) 890-3076
pilitobar87@gmail.com

Alabama Radio Host Embarks on
14 Day, 14 City Walk to Encourage Cross-Cultural Dialogue about HB 56

***Largest Spanish Language Radio Station in Alabama to Live Broadcast Daily from all 14 Cities***

Birmingham, AL – Rivera Communications and La Jefa Radio – the largest Spanish language radio station in Alabama – has launched “14 Cities, 14 Days, One Family, One Alabama,” an unprecedented effort to get Alabamans of all backgrounds and from all walks of life talking to one another about Alabama’s new immigration law.

José Antonio Castro, Program Director for La Jefa Radio station and radio personality Orlando Rosa will walk along “Route 56” for six hours each day through 14 cities over 14 days to conduct interviews and to broadcast a three hour live program which will be heard by listeners in up to 85 cities throughout Alabama and the U.S, as well as listeners in Mexico, Colombia, and Puerto Rico. 

Says Castro: “I want to encourage dialogue between my Spanish speaking listeners and Alabamans from different backgrounds.  I will bring the views of my listeners to the people I meet and give those Alabamans the chance to speak to upwards of 100,000 listeners throughout our state and around the world.  We need to speak to each other instead of speaking past each other – I hope that our walk and our conversations will help bring Alabamans together.”

The walk is currently underway.  They  began walking on Monday, November 07, 2011 in Athens, AL and will end on Saturday, November 19, 2011 at the state capitol in Montgomery, AL.

La Jefa radio encourages other media outlets to join the walk and broadcast in order to bring this important dialogue to your readers, viewers and listeners.

Today’s Stop: Cullman, AL (Walk will begin in Huntsville, AL)

How to join or follow the walk, community rallies and interviews:

CONTACT, NEW DEVELOPMENTS, EVENTS AND TRANSLATION: Pili Tobar, (305) 890-3076, pilitobar87@gmail.com.  Details about the walk, community rallies, interview schedules and additional news and events along the way will be provided as soon as they are available.

WALK: Daily beginning at 7:00 am central.

LIVE RADIO BROADCAST: Weekdays from 2:00 – 5:00 pm and weekends from 1:00 – 4:00 pm central from each destination city.

LISTEN:1500 AM WQCR Alabaster, 1450 AM WZGX Bessemer, 620 AM WJHX Lexington – or on the web at www.aquimandalajefa.com

TWITTER:@LaJefaAlabama

FACEBOOK:www.Facebook.com/aquimandalajefa

ITINERARY:

Tue, Nov 8:

  • Walk from Huntsville to Cullman, AL
  • Broadcast in Cullman

Wed, Nov 9:

  • Walk from Cullman to Albertville, AL
  • Broadcast in Albertville

Thur, Nov 10:

  • Walk from Albertville to Oneonta, AL
  • Broadcast in Oneonta

Fri, Nov 11:

  • Walk from Oneonta to Gardendale, AL
  • Broadcast in Gardendale

Sat, Nov 12:

  • Walk from Gardendale to Birmingham, AL
  • Broadcast in Birmingham
  • Major Community Rally – Kelly Ingraham Park, Birmingham

Sun, Nov 13:

  • Walk from Birmingham to Tuscaloosa, AL
  • Broadcast in Tuscaloosa

Mon, Nov 14:

  • Walk from Tuscaloosa to Centreville, AL
  • Broadcast in Centerville

Tue, Nov 15:

  • Walk from Centreville to Clanton, AL
  • Broadcast in Clanton

Wed, Nov 16:

  • Walk from Clanton to Selma, AL
  • Broadcast in Selma

Thur, Nov 17:

  • Walk from Selma to Prattville, AL
  • Broadcast in Prattville

Fri, Nov 18:

  • Walk from Prattville to Wetumpka, AL
  • Broadcast in Wetumpka

Sat, Nov 19:

  • Walk from Wetumpka to Montgomery, AL
  • Broadcast in Montgomery
  • Major community rally to conclude the walk in Montgomery (location TBD)

Rivera Communications and La Jefa Radio Station broadcasts to over 100,000 listeners along with many others via ustream.  La Jefa reports on local and national news, community service, and social events to encourage their listeners to engage in their community.  Jose Antonio Castro is a well-known radio personality with more than 24 years of experience in the radio industry and as a broadcaster.  Orlando Flores, also a radio personality for La Jefa radio will join Mr. Castro for the journey.

###

 


Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Parent Leadership Council Advocacy Initiative

October 11th, 2011 | For Parents and Other Advocates, Parent Leadership Council | Comments Off

From PTA/PTSA eNews & Notes – October 11, 2011

 Miami-Dade County Public Schools News

Parent Leadership Council
Advocacy Initiative
 
All information will be provided in Spanish and Haitian Creole on
October 11 and 13, 2011.
 
All information will be provided in English on
October 17, 2011.  

   Flyer in Spanish      

   http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=y5hf7qbab&v=0012ndadPBmR-JLuWPSVR6Ky80g4tWWQBwNh25v37_2ll5uYA9KzlMAPmf6ybGdY11kFL4VPBONx7qNmOkAhzRmFjb2G17PXg6DcD5FN2QyTMmvJOzEm-yHBkOwjdtsoTIjtqvMWLfUXlniU5-NVC12jEspYHcBAuZrFdkET2VIreD5oncv_7TaMBQ9P0arJFuAoaenrRr8MGCywJHd–n-dmZ5KA4vk67-             

  Flyer in Creole

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=y5hf7qbab&v=001B7Ca3ME3LkKSDqhadjrplF9VgZsZ1vLgMVDyjnRgCNKOeCHtHAB0AwtL-CGCAySns9AZD1gEADD7smwJBdggJ-SbyjObEyiDP_E4NQ_YTP1bF-t3XhQmc_RlxD5Aj__B-b3rzQN2So1JRlvm33QiDP6_2Ohkljcpt0kiXa-ZOvrvlKdB-fygbYP8ze_yqR8TvfPFY0Y00LGsoLInITAc-h80nq5VknD6
 
Please share this information with parents and community members.
 
Everyone planning to attend these sessions must register ASAP!
 
For questions call 305-995-1809

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

An apppeal on behalf of children in foster care

September 21st, 2011 | Uncategorized | Comments Off

 From Shamele Jenkins

Hello. I’m President of Miami Dade County Foster & Adoptive Parent Association (the caretakers of the more than 2,000 kids in foster care, kinship, adopted etc.) I’m soliciting help with our annual Xmas toy drive for foster care kids and gift cards for our teens. Can you do a drive at your company or with a few of your friends please? You may contact me at 305-469-1157 or 305-474-0078.
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Overview and update: Proposed ESOL eligibility rules go to the State Board of Education on Sept. 20th

September 13th, 2011 | Entry and Exit Criteria, Florida Board of Education | Comments Off

Sept. 20th UPDATE:
The board voted to  

1.Change the timeline for acceptable test scores for the extension of service rule to permit use of scores on a test taken

within two months of the student’s anniversary date instead of requiring use of results from a test taken two weeks

prior to the anniversary.

2. Add language recommended by META and the Florida Justice Center to the opting out rule or to the new rule to be

proposed on the District ELL Plan.

3. Approve all proposed ESOL rules.

 For summaries of the testimony presented, see
 
Board Member Barbara Feingold asked what would happen to a child whose parent opted out if the new teacher was not
prepared to teach ESOL students. Mary Jane Tappen, FDOE, stated that the same timelines for completion of training would
 apply to all teachers whether they are part of an ESOL program or not. [Without additional resources, it could take up to six
years for completion of requirements for ESOL Endorsement.]
 
A video of the meeting broadcast is available at http://www.fldoe.org/board/meetings/2011_09_20/meetingArchive.asp
The discussion on ESOL rules is on Part I (1.46.20 to 2.26.44).  
 
Sept. 19th UPDATE: Miami Herald publishes an editorial on the proposed rules.  
Sept. 17th UPDATE: If you plan to speak at the state board of education meeting, send a request for time on the agenda
to speak on ESOL rules to  Lynn Abbott at Lynn.Abbott@fldoe.org  
 Do this as soon as posible .
 
Sept. 12th UPDATE: META and the Florida Justice Center sent a letter of
concern regarding the proposed rules to the Florida State Board
 
 
The ESOL eligibility rules first discussed at Rule Development Workshops last Oct. in Miami and on August 4th in Orlando are
scheduled for submission to the State Board of Education on Sept. 20th.
 
Meeting Information
 
September 20, 2011 8:30 a.m. State Board of Education Meeting
Meeting Materials
Valencia Community College
West Campus
1800 South Kirkman Road
Building HSB, Room 105
Orlando, Florida
 Check here for updates or changes to the schedule
 
Proposed Rules
 
Here are the proposed ESOL Rules (including recent changes) and the FDOE’s rationale for their proposals
 
Legal Background
 
Consent Decree in English with links to Spanish and Haitian Kreyol versions
 
1994 FDOE/META Agreement confirming requirement for use of normed tests for determinations of eligbility for ESOL services  
 
 
Reasons for opposition to the proposed rules are presented in the following statements
 
Two LULAC Resolutions on the proposed ESOL rules, May, 2011
 
 
Two FABES Statements on the proposed ESOL Rules
 
 
 
Statement on proposed ESOL Rules by Rochelle Cisneros, Co-Moderator, SST Advocacy Mailing List
 
 Twenty-two statements on proposed ESOL rules submitted to the State Board of Education in Nov. 2010
 
Summary of Rule Development Workshops on these proposed rules
 
Aug. 4, 2011
 
Oct. 29, 2010
 
Submit Additional Comments to FDOE here
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Summary of Aug. 4, 2011 Rule Development Workshop on Proposed ESOL Eligibility Rules

August 17th, 2011 | ESOL Rule Development Workshop | Comments Off

Summary of Aug. 4, 2011 Rule Development Workshop on Proposed ESOL Eligibility Rules

 This summary is based on reports from four of the meeting participants.

On Aug. 4, 2011, the FDOE held a Rule Development Workshop on proposed ESOL rules, at 5 PM,OrangeCountyPublic Schools, Board Room,445 West Amelia Street,Orlando,Florida32801. The proposed rules will determine who is eligible for services for students learning English as a Second Language (ESOL) and for how long.

Issues

The same issues that framed the discussion at the Oct. 2010 Rule Development Workshop in Miami and related statements submitted to the FDOE came up at the Aug. 4 Workshop in Orlando, as follows.

 Do the proposed rules

  1. Contribute to improving the quality of education for all children?
  2. Reflect the ESOL Program’s dual mandate to provide instruction leading to English language acquisition and academic achievement that equips ELLs for success in school?
  3. Offer guidelines to help district personnel accurately identify and classify ELLs who need to be in the ESOL program and those who are ready to achieve academically without program support?
  4. Treat ELLs fairly and accord them the same expectations for high academic achievement as are held for all other students?
  5. Provide guidance to school administrators to ensure that ELLs receive a comprehensive and comprehensible program of instruction?  
  6. Conform to national standards for educational testing?
  7. Propose procedures and timelines that are reasonable?
  8. Inform policy makers and stakeholders in unambiguous terms of the effect of proposed policy changes through a process that takes into consideration the needs of the stakeholders whose input is solicited?
  9. Comply with the terms of the Consent Decree?
  10. Match former versions of the rules implementing the Consent Decree?

 

Who was there?

Lori Rodriguez, Bureau Chief, Student Achievement through Language Acquisition (SALA), Florida Department of Education (FDOE)

Educators from the following school districts:

Broward, Hillsborough,Lake, Manatee, Miami-Dade, Polk

Parents:

Broward County Public Schools (BCPS) Parent Leadership Council (PLC) Chair Zayra Climes Lenchus and (BCPS) PLC Staff Yvette Fernandez, Esq.

Professional Organizations and Associations:

FloridaAssociation of Bilingual and ESOL Supervisors (FABES) President, Sandra Rosario

FABES Recording Secretary, Kate Hoffman

FloridaEducation Association (FEA), Norma Craig

Community Based Organizations:

Stakeholders from Duval andOrangeCountiesincluded LULAC Florida State Director Jose Fernandez, member of the LULAC Florida State Executive Board Aidita Fernandez, and the NE Florida Council Director, Maria Machin

The dedication to the welfare of English Language Learners of the educators, parents, and representatives of professional and community based organizations who participated in this workshop is appreciated.

What Concerns were identified?

 The proposed rules that accelerate the timeline for completion of initial assessments elicited positive comment from the participants.

Several speakers outlined reasons for opposition to the proposed rules on opting-out, proposals for overuse of ELL committees instead of following the procedures required by the Consent Decree, and failure to require use of normed tests as specified in the Consent Decree and in a 1994 agreement between METAand the FDOE. The 1994 Agreement is here:  http://www.fldoe.org/aala/ipsclep.asp

LULAC Florida State Director Jose Fernandez pointed out that the 32nd percentile cutoff for eligibility is a floor, not a ceiling, and that the prerogatives of local school boards that want the opportunity to better prepare ELLs before they lose eligibility for ESOL services should be respected. He requested that the public be informed of the high quality of ESOL programs and that they use the same curriculum standards as those used in other programs.

ESOL Executive Director Rosa Ugalde, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, raised the following points:

1. CELLA cut scores should be established or each grade level instead of for the current grade spans, especially for grades K-2 where the language development between a K student and a 2nd grade student is significant.

2. Clarification of language that currently states ELLs may be re-evaluated “at any time” is needed.

3. Tracking anniversary dates, assessing ELLs and convening of ELL committees for extension of services would create undue burdens on large districts, causing possible FTE audit exemptions according to the language of the rule proposed.

Broward participants described the problems caused by refusal of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to recognize ESOL credits as fulfilling English Language Arts requirements. The NCAA will not approve scholarships for students whose transcripts include ESOL.

The FEA addressed the multiple issues enjoined in the current version of the proposed rule on opting-out.

Links to Related Statements

Statement by Rochelle Cisneros, Co-Moderator, Sunshine State TESOL Advocacy Mailing List http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-rochelle-cisneros-co-moderator-sunshine-state-tesol-advocacy-mailing-list/

Statement by Andy Ford, FEA President, Nov. 2010 http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-andy-ford-president-of-the-florida-education-association/

Two FABES Position Statements http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-florida-association-of-bilingual-and-esol-supervisors-fabes-june-7-2011/

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-oct-2010-fabes-dr-arnhilda-badia-fabes-legislative-liaison/

Two LULAC Florida resolutions http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rule-on-parent-notification-6a-6-0902-3-d/

http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rules-on-identification-and-entry-6a-6-0902-1-c-2-a-and-2-extension-of-service-6a-6-09022-1-2-3-program-exit-6a-6-0903-1-2-2/

Next Steps

Lori announced that her PowerPoint presentation and a summary of the comments will be posted on the FDOE/SALA web site.

It appears there will be some changes in the proposed rules in response to comments and statements presented since Oct. 2010. Requests were made to FDOE to provide ample time for review of any revisions to the proposed rules before they are presented for approval to the State Board of Education.

That review is currently scheduled for Sept. 20, inOrlando.

September 20, 2011 TBD State Board of Education Meeting ValenciaCommunity College
Building HSB, Room 105
Orlando,Florida

 

Check here for changes in the time, date, or location of the meeting, and for links to the meeting agenda and broadcast: http://www.fldoe.org/board/meetings/  and https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  

Written comments may be submitted here: https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  

Additional Resources

Background information, proposed rules, and links to twenty-two statements submitted Nov. 2010

http://esolfl.blog.com/2011/07/19/proposed-esol-rules-will-be-submitted-to-the-state-board-of-education-on-aug-4-2011/

xxx

.

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Florida Legislative Delegation Meetings, 2011-2012

August 6th, 2011 | Legislative Delegation Meetings | Comments Off

During these  meetings  the public gets to inform the legislative delegation about requests for funding or bills. There are two ways to provide input. You can sign up to speak at the meeting, or you can catch individual legislators before or after the meeting or when they take a break. To be sure of catching up with the pubic official, call the legislator’s office ahead of time. Keep your comments brief. Take your business cards or flyers and ask for contact  information so you can call for an appointment. Make friends with the Legislative Assistants. They are an important part of the legislative process.
 
If, for example, you believe that the quality of education has been damaged by budget cutbacks, say so. Give examples of the damage done. If you believe taxes should be raised as needed to meet this goal, say so. At the very least, ask the legislators to prioritize to meet their constitutionally mandated obligation to adequately fund public education. 
 
 If you have concerns about the ESOL rules that are scheduled to go to the State Board of Education on Sept. 20th for approval, ask your legislators to make inquiries about the rules you oppose, and to attend the meeting on the 20th. For background information on the proposed rules, see   http://esolfl.blog.com/2011/07/19/proposed-esol-rules-will-be-submitted-to-the-state-board-of-education-on-aug-4-2011/  You might also want to explain why you object to the new tuition and registration requirements for Adult Basic Education and Adult ESOL.
 
To begin your presentation, greet the members of the delegation and introduce yourself by giving your name, title and the name of your organizations. Also, thank the delegation members for allowing you an opportunity to speak.
 
 Here is contact information for Florida legislators:
 
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/representatives.aspx
 
http://www.flsenate.gov/Senators/
 
 
If your delegation meeting is not listed below, call your elected official to find out when it will be held.
 
August 10, 2011,  Miami-Dade: at the City of Miami City Hall, 9:30AM.  (3500 Pan American Drive). Ask your legislator’s office for a copy of the Hearing Signup form if you want to speak at the hearing, or  contact: La Rhonda Odom, Catalyst Miami Policy Director, larhondao@hscdade.org

For those interested in speaking before the Miami Dade Delegationm Catalyst Miami hosts a “free prep session” on Tuesday, August 9 at 6PM. http://www.soulofmiami.org/2011/08/05/miami-dade-legislative-delegation-hearing-81011/

 Brevard: Wednesday, September 7 at 3 p.m. The meeting will be held in the Brevard County Commission Chambers located at 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way (Building C) in Viera.          Anyone wishing to be placed on the meeting agenda should contact Bethany Iliff in Representative Workman’s Office in writing, at 33 Suntree Place, Suite D, Melbourne, FL 32940 by mail; Bethany.Iliff@myfloridahouse.gov by email; or 321-757-7021 by fax no later than 5 p.m. on Friday, August 26. Telephone inquiries may be directed to Representative Workman’s office at 321-757-7019. http://focusonbrevard.com/VirNews/read.asp?newsID=2721
 
Broward: Education and Cultural Affairs Public Hearing, Monday, Oct. 10, 2011, 4 p.m., Collins Elementary School, 1050 NW 2nd Street, Dania Beach. Additional meetings listed at http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/broward/blog/2011/08/broward_lawmakers_already_gear.html
 
Clay: Wednesday, Oct. 12, 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. at the County Administration Building, 477 Houston St. The delegation chairman is state Rep. Charles Van Zant Sr.

To be placed on the agenda, contact Van Zant’s office at 386-312-2272 by Monday, Oct. 10. http://www.claytoday.biz/content/3767_1.php

 Collier: day-long meeting Aug. 18.http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2011/jul/30/2012-florida-legislature-early-session-january/  . IFAS Auditorium in Immokalee, located at 2685 State Road 29 N, Immokalee, FL 34142; 9AM – 11AM. The delegation will reconvene at 2:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, City Hall, located at 735 8th Street South, Naples, FL 34102. For more information, call Representative Matt Hudson’s Office: 239-417-6270

 http://www.collierdems.org/events.asp?EventId=1380&nDate=8%2F18%2F2011
 

Hardee County Wednesday, September 14, 2011 Time: 2:00 pm

Location: Hardee County Commissioner’s Chambers, Room 102, of the Hardee County Courthouse Annex Building, 412 West Orange Street, Wauchula, FL 33873

Registration Deadline: If you would like to be placed on the agenda to speak, please contact Representative Ben Albritton’s District Secretary, Karen Whaley at 863-534-0073 no later than 12:00 pm on Wednesday, September 7, 2011.  Five (5) copies of all handouts and other information for delegation members must be received by Representative Albritton’s District Office at Post Office Box 1966, Bartow, Florida 33831 by Wednesday, September 7, 2011 or may be hand delivered to 206 North 6th Avenue, Wauchula, Florida 33873.http://flimmigrant.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/upcoming-legislative-delegation-hearings-september-2011/

Hernando County , Oct. 24, 2011,  10 a.m.-1 p.m., commission chambers, Hernando County Government Center, 20 N Main St., Brooksville.

 Highlands County Wednesday, September 14, 2011 Time: 9:30 am

Location:Highlands County Government Center, 600 South Commerce Avenue, Sebring, Florida 33870

Registration Deadline: If you would like to be placed on the agenda to speak, please contact Representative Ben Albritton’s District Secretary, Karen Whaley, at 863-534-0073 no later than 12:00 pm on Wednesday, September 7, 2011. Six (6) copies of all handouts and other information for delegation members must be received by Representative Albritton’s District Office at Post Office Box 1966, Bartow, Florida 33831 by Wednesday, September 7, 2011  or may be hand delivered to 150 North Central Avenue in Bartow, Florida http://flimmigrant.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/upcoming-legislative-delegation-hearings-september-2011/

 
 Hillsborough: Tuesday, September 27, in Oval Theater in the Marshall Student Center on the campus of the University of South Florida beginning at 9:00 a.m. www.hillsboroughcounty.org/legislativedelegation Forms for local bills and for speakers on other issues are on the Delegation’s Website at www.hillsboroughcounty.org/legislativedelegation and then link to “Regular Session. 
 
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY: Wednesday, September 28, 2011, 9:00 Am, 1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, FL.
Notes: Email Dustin Paulson in Representative Mayfield’s Office by phone at 772-778-5077 or email dustin.paulson@myfloridahouse.govno later than Friday, September 16, 2011 to address the delegation.  http://www.floridastourismcounts.org/?page_id=428
 
Levy County, Sept. 22, 3-5 p.m. at the Levy County Courthouse, 355 S. Court St., Bronson, in the County Commission Chambers.

Marion County Tuesday, September 27, 2011 Time: 1:00 pm – 6:00 pm

Location: College of Central Florida, Klein Center, 3001 SW College Rd, Ocala, FL 34474

Registration Deadline: Appearance/Comment cards should be returned to the office of Representative Baxley before September 12, 2011 to assure placement on the meeting agenda.  Cards can be mailed to 315 SE 25 Ave, Ocala, FL 34471, faxed to 352-732-1360, or emailed to Lorri Silvera, District Executive Secretary, District 24 at Lorri.Silvera@myfloridahouse.gov

Also, if you have handouts they need to be sent in by September 12, 2010 to the Ocala address above.  Please include nine (9) copies of any printed materials for the meeting.  The copies will be distributed to the Delegation Members at the meeting. http://flimmigrant.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/upcoming-legislative-delegation-hearings-september-2011/

Okaloosa: November 10, from 4:30 until 6 p.m. at Northwest Florida State College located at 100 College Boulevard in Niceville. The meeting will take place in Building K, inside the Gallery Room. http://chipleybugle.com/news/2011/11/10/okaloosa-county-legislative-delegation-to-hold-public-hearing/

Orange County: Meeting of the Central Florida Legislative Delegation Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011
Time: 9:00 am – 11:30 am

University of Central Florida UCF FAIRWINDS Alumni Center
126 Gemini Boulevard
Orlando, FL 32816

Contact: Pam Clancy
Phone: 407.835.2486
Email: pam.clancy@orlando.org

Palm Beach: Wednesday, September 7, 2011 in Jupiter at the Scripps Research Institute from 2:00pm – 5:00pm.  Four additional hearings will be held throughout the county on Tuesday, October 11th in Belle Glade, Wednesday, October 26th in Royal Palm Beach, Tuesday, November 8th in Boca Raton, and on Thursday, December 1stin West Palm Beach. Anyone requiring further information or wishing to be placed on the September 7th agenda should contact the Legislative Delegation office at 561/355-2406. http://www.treasurecoast.com/index.cfm/news/legislative-delegation-schedules-public-hearings/

 Pasco County Monday, September 26, 2011 Time: 1:00 pm – 5:00 pm

Location: River Ridge High School, 11646 Town Center Road Port Richey, FL 34654

Registration: There is no registration form. If you are interested in speaking contact Representative Richard Corcoran’s District Secretary, Doris Graumann at (727) 816-1580 no later than 12:00 pm on Monday, September 19, 2011 http://flimmigrant.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/upcoming-legislative-delegation-hearings-september-2011/

Pinellas County Wednesday, September 14, 2011 Time: 9:00 am – 12:00 pm

Location: Pinellas Park Performing Arts Center, 4951 78th Ave, Pinellas Park, FL 33781
Registration Deadline: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 http://flimmigrant.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/upcoming-legislative-delegation-hearings-september-2011/

St. Lucie County Thursday, September 8, 2011 Time: 9:00 am

Location: Indian River State College, Kight Center for Emerging Technologies, 3209 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34981

Registration Deadline: To be placed on the agenda, please return the attached form and 8 copies of all handouts and other information by 12:00 pm on Thursday September 1, 2011. http://flimmigrant.wordpress.com/2011/08/29/upcoming-legislative-delegation-hearings-september-2011/

 xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

National PTA’s Urban Family Engagement Initiative Third Annual Back to School Event

August 2nd, 2011 | For Parents and Other Advocates | Comments Off

From Carolyn Nelson-Goedert, Team Lead, National PTA Urban Family Engagement Initiative,  Miami

National PTA’s Urban Family Engagement Initiative invites you to join us for our third annual Back to School Event. 

 

 We have partnered with Belafonte TACOLCY Center, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, Urban Greenworks and
others to bring an awesome  Back to School GreenFest:
Planting Seeds for Education event to the community.

 

We will have a DJ, refreshments (small fee), face painting, Let’s Move – Move Your Body workout, a mini cancer walk and so much more!

 Workshops for parents/caregivers will be offered in English,
Spanish and Creole throughout the day; schedule
available on site.

 

See you on Saturday, August 6, 2011, at 10:00 am.
 TACOLCY is located at 6161 NW 9th Avenue.

 

Please share this information with your email list.
xxx
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Aug.4, 2011, Florida Department of Education Rules Hearing on Proposed ESOL Rules, in Orlando

July 27th, 2011 | ESOL Rule Development Workshop | Comments Off

July 22nd UPDATE on changes to the schedule for review of proposed ESOL rules.

  On Aug. 4, 2011, the FDOE will hold another Rule Development Workshop on proposed ESOL rules, at 5 PM, Orange County Public Schools, Board Room, 445 West Amelia Street, Orlando, Florida 32801. These rules will determine who is eligible for services for students learning English as a Second Language (ESOL) and for how long.
 
 See http://esolfl.blog.com/2011/07/19/proposed-esol-rules-will-be-submitted-to-the-state-board-of-education-on-aug-4-2011/ for background information and  for comments previously submitted on the proposed rules. They bear repeating. It is important for parents and teachers of  ESOL students and community group representatives  to be at this meeting to explain the problems with the proposed rules.

The date and place for submission of ESOL Rules to the State Board of Education has been changed to Sept. 20,  2011 in Orlando.  

Check here for changes in the time, date, or location of the meeting, and for links to the meeting agenda and broadcast: http://www.fldoe.org/board/meetings/  and https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  

Written comments may be submitted here: https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Aug. 4, 2011, ESOL Rule Development Workshop; Sept, 20, 2011, Proposed ESOL Rules will be submitted to the State Board of Education

July 19th, 2011 | Entry and Exit Criteria, LULAC International Embassy to Latin America and the Caribbean | Comments Off

July 22nd UPDATE on changes to the schedule for review of proposed ESOL rules: 

  On Aug. 4, 2011, the FDOE will hold another Rule Development Workshop on proposed ESOL rules, at 5 PM, Orange County Public Schools, Board Room, 445 West Amelia Street, Orlando, Florida 32801. See the information below for comments previously submitted on the proposed rules. They bear repeating. It is important for ESOL advocates to be at this meeting to explain the problems with the proposed rules.

The date and place for submission of ESOL Rules to the State Board of Education has been changed to Sept. 20,  2011 in Orlando.  

Check here for changes in the time, date, or location of the meeting, and for links to the meeting agenda and broadcast: http://www.fldoe.org/board/meetings/  and https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  

Comments may be submitted here: https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  

Background

The proposed rules are important because they determine who will receive ESOL services and for how long. They are controversial because they impinge on the civil rights of a quarter million Florida English Language Learners, 12% of the total student population in 2008-2009.

A Rule Development Workshop was held by the Florida Department of Education (FDOE) in Miami on Oct. 29, 2010 to receive comments on the proposed rules on criteria for eligibility for participation in programs in English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) for English Language Learners (ELLs). A summary of that Workshop is here:  http://esolfl.blog.com/summary-of-comments-and-statements-on-proposed-florida-state-board-of-education-rules-on-criteria-for-eligibility-for-esol/

The current set of proposed ESOL rules is here: https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/doc/6A-6.0902_148.doc  or here http://esolfl.blog.com/proposed-esol-eligibility-rules-to-be-considered-by-the-state-board-of-education-on-june-21-2011/

Key Issues 

1. Compliance with the Consent Decree

Only one of the five sets of proposed rules (6A-6.09031: Post Reclassification of English Language Learners) does not seem to pose conflicts with the LULAC Consent Decree. The other four sets of proposed rules have generated multiple comments of opposition by stakeholders, as documented below. The appropriate process for the state to initiate changes is to negotiate with the attorneys for the Consent Decree prior to proposing a rule change. There is already an ESOL matter pending in the Administrative Hearing Court as a result of ignoring the Consent Decree.

2. Normed Tests

The purpose of entry and exit procedures is to identify students who need ESOL services and those who don’t. Eligibility decisions must take into consideration both language proficiency and academic achievement. When an English Language Learner knows enough English and has mastered enough academic content to be able to keep up with his English language origin classmates, he is ready to exit the program. Premature program exit would result in academic failure for ELLs and would slow down the teaching and learning process for their English proficient classmates.

The academic status of ELLs (including ELLs who exited the program in the prior two years) is precarious.  According to FDOE data, in 2010, only three percent of Grade 10 ELLs earned a Level 3 passing score on FCAT Reading in 2010 and 23% in Math; five percent of Grade 11 ELLs earned a Level 3 score in science.  For 2011, 58% of ELLs scored below grade level inReading and 47% below grade level in Math. The State NCLB Graduation rate for ELLs for 2008-2009 was 56.8%. For 2010-2011,Florida did not meet AYP standards for ELLs inReading or in Math.

Yet the FDOE proposes use of CELLA and FCAT scores as the basis for decisions on eligibility for ESOL services. However, neither the CELLA nor the FCAT are norm referenced tests as required by the LULAC Consent Decree. The CELLA is administered only to ELLs and the FCAT is a standards based criterion referenced test. Normed tests provide a means of comparing student achievement with a norm group that includes native speakers of English. The purpose of a norm referenced test is to compare a student’s achievement with that of a sample of students of similar age and grade from the general school population who make up the norming group, a comparison that can only be made through a normed test.

Further, on May 31, 2011, an agreement on the use of normed tests as part of the process to determine eligibility for ESOL services between the FDOE andMETAwas discovered and sent to the Vice Chair of the State Board who in turn forwarded it to the Department.

The agreement is posted here: http://esolfl.blog.com/agreement-governing-identification-placement-screening-and-classification-of-lep-students-between-fdoe-and-meta/ and here  http://www.fldoe.org/aala/ipsclep.asp?style=print .

This 1994 document confirms the state’s agreement that the Consent Decree requires the use of normed tests as part of the process to determine eligibility for ESOL services.

 Accordingly, the following questions were posed to the Department of Education on June 1st:

1. Does the Department plan to honor the agreements documented in this memo?

2.  If so, will the proposed rules be revised to incorporate those agreements prior to the board meeting?

These questions were forwarded by Ms Rodriguez to the FDOE Legal Department. As of July 19, 2011, the 1994 Agreement is still under review.

3. The CELLA

Adoption of the proposed ESOL rules would continue the practice of reporting and setting cut-off scores on the CELLA by grade clusters instead of following the practice for reporting FCAT scores on a precise grade-by-grade basis. The grade cluster procedure obscures information and can result in over-identification of students in the upper levels of the grade cluster and in under-identification of those in the lower levels in the grade cluster. In other words, some students who need ESOL won’t get it and some that don’t need it will.

4. Parent Notification (Opting-out)

Proposed rule 6A-6.0902 (3) (d)  states that “Parents have the right to have their child immediately removed from a language instruction educational program and to decline to enroll the student in such a program or choose other instructional options, if available [emphasis added]. The FDOE proposal would insert into state rule applicable to all districts this Title III regulation. However, in 2009-2010, thirty-six per cent ofFlorida’s Local Education Agencies (LEAs) did not receive funds under Title III of ESEA. More importantly, the “if available” phrase in the proposed rule suggests that districts have no continuing obligation to ensure appropriate language instruction and access to the curriculum for students whose parents choose to withdraw them from a language instruction educational program. This interpretation is in direct conflict with the position of the U.S. Department for Civil Rights that “When a parent declines participation [in an alternative language program], the district retains a responsibility to ensure that the student has an equal opportunity to have his or her English language and academic needs met.”

On May 29, 2011, LULAC Florida adopted two resolutions on the proposed ESOL rules at its annual State Convention, subsequently approved by the LULAC National General Assembly on Saturday, July 2, 2011.   The LULAC resolution on proposed rules for eligibility for ESOL programs is here:  http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rules-on-identification-and-entry-6a-6-0902-1-c-2-a-and-2-extension-of-service-6a-6-09022-1-2-3-program-exit-6a-6-0903-1-2-2/ . The LULAC resolution on proposed rules on Parent Notification is here: http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rule-on-parent-notification-6a-6-0902-3-d/  . 

These resolutions were sent to the FDOE to be forwarded to the members of the State Board of Education on June 7, 2011 along with additional statements by members of the Sunshine State TESOL Advocacy Mailing List. On that same date, the Florida Association of Bilingual and ESOL Supervisors sent an additional position statement on these rules. The link to the FABES statement is here http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-florida-association-of-bilingual-and-esol-supervisors-fabes-june-7-2011/

For the readers’ convenience, the LULAC resolutions are appended at the end of this message.

The following statements on the proposed ESOL rules were among those submitted to FDOE in November 2010.  

Albert Collazo, LULAC Florida State Deputy Director; Chairman, Florida State Hispanic Chamber of Commerce; Director, Hispanic Council for Reform and Educational Options (Hispanic CREO)

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-albert-collazo-lulac-florida-state-deputy-director-chairman-florida-state-hispanic-chamber-of-commerce-director-hispanic-council-for-reform-and-educat/

Topics: 6A-6.0903 (2) b Normed test, Beef up standards

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

Examples of violations

Monitoring needed

Stripping resources from ELLs not the way to solve budget problems

 Andy Ford, President of the Florida Education Association

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-andy-ford-president-of-the-florida-education-association/

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

2010 Settlement Agreement between theBostonPublic Schoolsand OCR/Dept. of Justice, Item 37

OCR’s letter to Denver Public Schools

Place ELL students with ESOL credentialed teachers

Angela Santos, Retired Principal, MDCPS; Faculty member, MiamiDadeCollege,Hialeah Campus

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-angela-santos-retired-principal-mdcps/

Topics: 6A- 6.09021 (4) (b) CELLA Score ranges 

6A.-6.09021 (1) CELLA

6A-6.09022 (1) ELL Committees/ Extension of ESOL Services

 Aymet Chaples, Interim CEO, ASPIRA of Florida, Inc.

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-aymet-chaples-interim-ceo-aspira-of-florida-inc/

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

6A-6.0903 Normed test, 32nd percentile, Raise cut score to decrease ELL dropouts

6A- 6.09021 (4) (b) and (c) Cut scores/grade clusters, Raise cut scores for subsequent improved student performance

6A-6.09022 (1) ELL Committees, impact on Charter Schools

ELL Committee as problem solver, not as SOP         

Danielle Montes, Director of Community Outreach, Florida Education Association (the state affiliate of the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers)

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-danielle-montes-director-of-community-outreach-for-the-florida-education-association-the-state-affiliate-of-the-national-education-association-and-the-am/

Topics: 6A-6.0902, 6A-6.0902 1 ,6A-6.09022, 6A-6.0903, Location in Consent Decree of requirements for normed tests and for providing service while assessments are pending

6A-6.0902 (1) (c) Language of the home

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

6A-6.09022 (1) ELL Committee/Extension of Services,

Meeting location and timing

Consultation

Dr. Lydia Medrano, LULAC Florida State Education Commissioner; Community Outreach Manager for the Hillsborough Children’s Board, previously HCB’s Researcher/Evaluator

 http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-dr-lydia-medrano-lulac-florida-state-education-commissioner/

Topics: 6A-6.0903 (2) (2) (a) 2a Multiple measures needed for K-2

Dr. Victor Vazquez-Hernandez, President of the National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights (NCPRR), Immediate Past Chair, ASPIRA of Florida, Inc.

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-dr-victor-vazquez-hernandez-president-of-the-national-congress-for-puerto-rican-rights-ncprr-immediate-past-chair-aspira-of-florida-inc/

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (1) (c) Language of the home

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal/No prior rules

6A-6.0903 (2) (a) 2. a Multiple measures

6A-6.0903 (2) b and c Normed Test/Definition in 1990 Rule;

Decree has not changed; why have the rules changed?

Monitoring and evaluation reports as prerequisite to further rulemaking  

Dr. Oneyda Paneque, President of the Bilingual Association of Florida (BAF); Treasurer of Miami-Dade TESOL; faculty member, Miami Dade College School of  Education Teacher Education Programs

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-dr-oneyda-paneque-baf-and-miami-dade-tesol/

Topics: 6A.-6.09021 CELLA

6A.-6.09021 (2) CELLA Performance Data

6A.-6.09021 (4) Grade clusters are not used for FCAT; why use them for CELLA? State Board Member Shanahan argued that ELLs should be treated in the same way as       other students in terms of testing policies.

6A.-6.09021 (5) Consultation

6A-6.09022 ELL Committee/Extension of Services, Normed test, Limited school resources

6A.6.0903 Consent Decree requirements

Edna Canino, President, LULAC Florida Embassy Council; Special Assistant to the LULAC Florida State Director; former National Vice President of LULAC; General Counsel for LULAC’s International Ambassador to Latin America and the Caribbean; Counsel to the Institute for Mexicans in the Exterior (IME) in Miami

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-edna-caninopresident-of-the-lulac-florida-embassy-council-special-assistant-to-the-lulac-florida-state-director-former-national-vice-president-of-lulac/

Topics: 6A-6.0902 .2, 6A-6.09022 (1) and (2), and 6A-6.0903 (1) and (2) Consent Decree/Normed tests,

6A-6.0903 (2) c, 6A-6.0902. 2, and 6A-6.0903 (2) b 32nd percentile

 6A-6.0902 (1) (c) Language of the home

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

6A- 6.09021 (4) Grade clusters

6A-6.0903 (2) 2.a Multiple measures needed

6A- 6.09021 (1) CELLA

Jose Fernandez, LULAC Florida State Director

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-jose-fernandez-lulac-florida-state-director/

Topics: 6A-6.0902. 2 32nd percentile too low given ELL achievement status

Contrast with 50th percentile cut score on alternative standardized reading assessment

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal, civil rights guarantees

Lourdes Amaro Jasper, LULAC Florida State Deputy Director for Youth; Director of Women and Family Issues, LULAC Embassy for Latin America and the Caribbean

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-lourdes-jasper-lulac-florida-state-deputy-director-for-youth-director-of-women-and-family-issues-lulac-embassy-for-latin-america-and-the-caribbean/

Topics: 6A-6.0903 (2) b and c. Normed test, 32nd percentile

Concordant scores/Premature exit as obstacle to eligibility for scholarships

Ambiguous language

Marcos Regalado, President, Spanish American League Against Discrimination (SALAD)

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-marcos-regalado-president-spanish-american-league-against-discrimination-salad/

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent Refusal/FDOE responsibility

6A-6.0903 (2) b and c. Normed test, 32nd percentile

Goal is parity of participation

Monitoring and evaluation reports needed for baseline information

Rochelle Cisneros, Co-Moderator, Sunshine State TESOL Advocacy Mailing List; previously ESOL teacher and teacher trainer in two states   

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-rochelle-cisneros-co-moderatorsunshine-state-tesol-advocacy-mailing-list/  

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal,

2010 Settlement Agreement between theBostonPublic Schoolsand OCR/Dept. of Justice, Items 36 and 37

Ambiguous language

 Wally Gallart, Retired teacher, engineer, and former military officer and recruiter

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-wally-gallart-retired-teacher-engineer-and-former-military-officer-and-recruiter/

Topics: 6A-6.0902, 6A-6.09021, 6A-6.09022, 6A-6.0903, Consent Decree, Language of the home, Normed tests;

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

The Colombian American National Coalition, Inc. (CANCO)/Center for Immigrant Advancement, Inc. (CIMA)

 http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-nov-2010-the-colombian-american-national-coalition-inc-cancocenter-for-immigrant-advancement-inc-cima/

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

BostonSchool District’s settlement plan with the federal Department of Education Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Justice

Armando V. Pomar, Past LULAC Florida State Director; Education Advisor to the LULAC National Education Service Centers; President of LULAC Council #7063; Past Member of the  National LULAC Board; Past LULAC Florida District Director; Dade Chapter Chairman for National Image

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-armando-v-pomar-lulac-florida/

Topics: 6A-6.09022, 6A- 6.09021, 6A-6.09022, 6A-6.0903: Consent Decree, Normed tests, Language of the home

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parental refusal

 Dr. Rosa Castro Feinberg, Chair, Education Committee, Florida Embassy LULAC Council #7220; Member, LULAC State Education Commission; Member, LULAC National Education Committee; International Director for Educational Affairs, LULAC International Embassy; Manager, Sunshine State TESOL Advocacy Mailing List

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-oct-2010-dr-rosa-castro-feinberg-lulac-florida-and-sst-advocacy-mailing-list/ 

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (1) (c) Language of the Home

6A-6.0902.2, 6A-6.09022, 6A-6.0903 Normed tests

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

6A-6.0902.2 32nd Percentile

6A- 6.09021 CELLA/Score ranges/Grade clusters

Notification, consultation, and transparency

 Dr. Arnhilda Badia, FABES Legislative Liaison; President, Jose Marti Foundation

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-oct-2010-fabes-dr-arnhilda-badia-fabes-legislative-liaison/ 

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

6A-6.09022 (2) Timeline

6A-6.0903.2.1 K-2 Multiple measures needed

6A-6.0903(2)2.c Extension of service

Minimal input allowed expert committee

Guidance documents not public

Julio Alva, LULAC Florida District Director; LULAC Latin American and Caribbean Embassy Peruvian Attaché

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-oct-2010-julio-alva-lulac-florida/ 

Topics: 6A-6.0902 (1) c. Language of the home

6A-6.0902 .2 Norm referenced test

6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

6A-6.09022 Extension of Service

6A-6.0903 Norm referenced tests

Marta L. Zayas, American Hispanic Educators Association of Dade (AHEAD); Teacher, Emerson Elementary, Miami-Dade County Public Schools

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-oct-2010-marta-l-zayas-american-hispanic-educators-association-of-dade-ahead/ 

Topic: 6A-6.09022 Extension of ESOL services/ELL Committees

Consider realities of daily life in the schools

Lack of training standards for members of ELL Committees

Normed test/32nd percentile

Rick Tapia, LULAC Florida; Teacher of science, Ponce de Leon Middle School, social studies Coral Park Adult Center, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and Government for Miami Dade College; Previously Administrative Assistant to Board Member Renier Diaz de la Portilla; former member, City of Miami’s Zoning Commission

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-rick-tapia-lulac-florida/

Topic: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

Transparency

Meeting schedule excludes working people

Roz Castle, Chairperson of the Miami-Dade Coalition for Community Education Board of Trustees; Child and Adult Advocate for the Miami Dade County Public Schools; Supervisor of Pre Student Teachers for Florida Memorial University; Previously Adjunct Professor in Bilingual Education and Curriculum Design for Nova University; member, Miami-Dade County Council of PTAs/PTSAs, Kiwanis Club of Miami Beach, Board of Directors of the Citizens of the Arts (C.I.A.)

http://esolfl.blog.com/statement-on-proposed-esol-rules-oct-2010-roz-castle-chairperson-of-the-miami-dade-coalition-for-community-education-board-of-trustees/

Topic: 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) Parent refusal

LULAC Resolutions on the proposed ESOL Rules  

LULAC Florida Resolution on Proposed ESOL Rule on Parent Notification, (6A-6.0902 (3) (d)

LULAC Florida Resolution on Parental Notification

For ESOL Program Services

 

Approved by LULACFloridaon May 29, 2011

Approved by the LULAC National General Assembly on Saturday, July 2, 2011

 

WHEREAS, the Florida Council of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is committed to improving the education of English Language Learners (ELLs); and,

WHEREAS, LULAC Florida is the first named plaintiff in LULAC v. Florida Board of Education, the source of the Consent Decree; and,

WHEREAS, LULAC Florida expects that proposed ESOL rules will meet Floridian’s demands for school programs that teach children the English language;  reflect the LULAC Consent Decree’s dual mandate to provide instruction leading to English language acquisition and academic achievement; comply with the terms of the Consent Decree and its incorporated mandates from civil rights laws and court decisions; provide guidance to school administrators to ensure that ELLs receive a comprehensive and comprehensible program of instruction; and inform policy makers, parents, and other stakeholders in unambiguous terms of the effect of proposed policy changes; and,

WHEREAS, proposed rule 6A-6.0902 (3) (d)  states that “Parents have the right to have their child immediately removed from a language instruction educational program and to decline to enroll the student in such a program or choose other instructional options, if available [emphasis added]. For purposes of this subparagraph, a “language instruction educational program” means an instruction course in which an ELL is placed for the purpose of developing and attaining English proficiency and which may make instructional use of both English and a child’s native language. Nothing herein shall alter the duty of the district to provide highly qualified, duly certified or endorsed ESOL instructors in accordance with Rule 6A-1.09441, F.A.C., and the Course Code Directory and Instructional Personnel Assignments that is incorporated by reference therein.”; and,

WHEREAS, the proposed rule’s opting-out provision and the definition of an instructional program are excerpts from ESEA Regulation 3302(a)(8); and,

WHEREAS, ESEA Regulation 3302(a)(8) applies only to entities using federal funds provided under Title III of ESEA; and,

WHEREAS, in 2009-2010, thirty-six per cent of our Local Education Agencies (LEAs) did not receive funds under Title III of ESEA; and,

WHEREAS, confusion will be created by inserting in state board rule applicable to all districts content which is not applicable to thirty-six per cent of our LEAs; and,

WHEREAS, the proposed rule includes only part of ESEA Regulation 3302(a)(8), but does not include the rest of the section with timelines and required content for parent information and the requirement for parent training, or guidelines from Items 36 and 37 on parent refusal form the 2010 Boston School District’s settlement plan with the federal Department of Education Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Justice, omissions that increases the potential for confusion and misinterpretation among school administrators and the public; and,

WHEREAS,   the “if available” phrase in the proposed rule suggests that districts have no continuing obligation to ensure appropriate language instruction and access to the curriculum for students whose parents choose to withdraw them from a language instruction educational program; and,

WHEREAS, on the contrary, the position of the U.S. Department for Civil Rights is that “When a parent declines participation [in an alternative language program], the district retains a responsibility to ensure that the student has an equal opportunity to have his or her English language and academic needs met.”; and,

WHEREAS, as written, 6A-6.0902 (3) (d) flouts over thirty-five years of a rich legacy of civil rights decisions, legislation, and regulations by suggesting that school districts’ responsibilities to address ELL’s language acquisition needs and provide for their access to the curriculum are terminated should parents opt-out and by failing to provide guidelines as to how these responsibilities can be met in cases of parent refusal; and,

WHEREAS, while the proposed rule specifies the duty of the district to provide “highly qualified, duly certified or endorsed ESOL instructors in accordance with Rule 6A-1.09441, F.A.C., and the Course Code Directory and Instructional Personnel Assignments that is incorporated by reference therein” as a necessary and commendable first step in ensuring equity for ELLs, however, the proposed rule does not include a schedule for monitoring the opting-out process to ensure that appropriate information and guidance was provided to the parents, or a reminder of the district’s legal obligation to abide by civil rights laws, including the LULAC Consent Decree, such as the following statement: “Lack of a student’s participation in a Title III program does not relieve a school district of any obligation it may have under state or federal law to continue to provide appropriate services to ELLs”; and,

WHEREAS, No ESOL credential requirement and no requirement that the district  provide appropriate instructional strategies to meet the needs of ESOL students enrolled in the course is stated in the course descriptions for the vast majority of the Language Arts courses listed in the Course Code Directory, and not all ESOL related courses specify that the district must provide appropriate instructional strategies to meet the needs of ESOL students, yet the proposed rule does not address these issues; and,

WHEREAS, the proposed rule does not make clear the effect of parental refusal; the rule could mean parents can only opt-out of Title III funded programs, or of classroom settings composed entirely of ESOL students, or of courses that make instructional use of the home language, or of courses designed to meet the needs of ELLS resulting in the transfer of their children to courses that are not so designed; and,

WHEREAS, if the rule is intended to permit parents to opt-out of courses designed to meet the needs of ELLS resulting in the transfer of their children to courses that are not so designed, additions to the rule are needed but not addressed to extend ESOL training requirements stated in the Course Code Directory to instructors for the many courses listed under Language Arts that do not presently include that requirement; and,

WHEREAS, the Department of Education has agreed it has the obligation to set standards for school districts and to enforce such standards, as documented in Item 3 of the Settlement Agreement, it is correspondingly obliged to make these responsibilities crystal clear to school districts and the public; and,

WHEREAS, the proposed rule raises many more questions and issues than can be effectively addressed at a meeting of the State Board of Education; 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that LULACFloridaurges the State Board of Education to withhold approval of proposed rule 6A-6.0902 (3) (d).

References

Boston School District’s settlement plan with the federal Department of Education Office for Civil Rights and the Department of Justice, Items 36 and 37 on Parent Refusal, Oct. 1, 2010 Settlement Agreement Between the United States of America and the Boston Public Schools,  http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/01105001-b.pdf

Course Code Directory, http://www.fldoe.org/articulation/CCD/files/1011CCDBasicPK-5.pdf

and https://www.flrules.org/Gateway/reference.asp?No=Ref-00222

ESEA SEC. 3302. PARENTAL NOTIFICATION, http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg50.html#sec3302

OCR’s letter to DenverPublic Schoolsdated July 31, 1997, OCR Case # 08951023, at page 7, https://fasp.websitesource.net/PDF_Files/Cultural_&_Linguistic_Diversity/OCRvDenver.pdf

LULAC Florida Resolution on Proposed ESOL Rules on Identification and Entry (6A-6.0902 (1) (c), (2) (a), and 2); Extension of Service (6A-6.09022 (1), (2), (3); Program Exit (6A-6.0903 (1), (2), (2) (a) 2a, b, c, and (2)(b) 2 and 3); and Annual Assessment (6A-6.09021)

LULAC Florida Resolution in Opposition to Proposed Rules on Eligibility for ESOL Program Services

 

Approved by LULACFloridaon May 29, 2011

Approved by the LULAC National General Assembly on Saturday, July 2, 2011

 

WHEREAS, the Florida Council of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is committed to improving the education of English Language Learners (ELLs; and,

WHEREAS, LULAC Florida is the first named plaintiff in LULAC v. Florida Board of Education, the source of the Consent Decree; and,

WHEREAS, LULAC Florida expects that proposed ESOL rules will reflect the Consent Decree’s dual mandate to provide instruction leading to English language acquisition and academic achievement; offer guidelines to help district personnel accurately identify and classify ELLs who need to be in the ESOL program and those who are ready to achieve academically without program support and thereby contribute to improving the quality of education for all children; treat ELLs fairly and accord them the same expectations for high academic achievement as are held for all other students; conform to national standards for educational testing; comply with the terms of the Consent Decree; and, since the Consent Decree’s entry and exit criteria have  not changed, match former versions of the rules implementing the Consent Decree; and,                              

WHEREAS, proposed rule 6A-6.0902 (1) (c) proposes to deny service to students pending assessment whose only affirmative response to the Home Language Survey is to the question regarding language of the home; and,

WHEREAS, the requirement to provide ESOL services to students pending assessment is stated in the Identification and Assessment section of the LULAC Consent Decree, at C. 1, 2, and 5; and,

WHEREAS, proposed rule 6A-6.0902 (1) (c) is therefore in conflict with a Federal Court Order; and,

WHEREAS, proposed rules on identification and entry (6A-6.0902 (2) (a) and 2); extension of service for more than three years (6A-6.09022 (1), (2); and (3); program exit (6A-6.0903 (1), (2) and (2) (b) 2 and 3) do not conform to the requirements stated in the Consent Decree that students are eligible for ESOL services until they achieve at the 33rd percentile or above on a normed test of reading and writing but instead state that the CELLA and the FCAT will be used as a basis for eligibility determinations; and,

WHEREAS, neither the CELLA nor the FCAT is a normed test; and,

WHEREAS, Section I. C. 2 b (1) of the Consent Decree states that ” Any student who scores at or below the 32nd percentile on the reading and writing sub-parts of a norm-referenced test shall be determined to be LEP and shall be provided appropriate services.”  This requirement is repeated in I.4, stated again in I.E.1 (a), Classification and Reclassification, and yet again in VI. E. 1. a, b, and c,  Outcome Measures, a restatement of the purposes of ESOL Programs that makes it clear that both English language proficiency and academic achievement are program goals and that both must be measured. This explains why eligibility decisions must take into consideration both language proficiency and academic achievement; and,

WHEREAS, proposed rules 6A-6.0902 (2) (a) and 2; 6A-6.09022 (1), (2); and (3); and 6A-6.0903 (1), (2) and (2) (b) 2 and 3 are therefore in conflict with a Federal Court Order; and,

WHEREAS, the Consent Decree is intended to protect the rights of language minority children; and,

 WHEREAS, The Florida Department of Education is tasked with upholding the rights of all students; and,

WHEREAS, Decree standards are explicitly identified as minimal in the Settlement Agreement; and,

WHEREAS, the public expects ESOL services of sufficient intensity and duration to prepare ELLs to compete effectively in school and after graduation in today’s shrinking world and global economy; and,

WHEREAS, normed tests provide a means of comparing student achievement with a national norm group that includes native speakers of English while the CELLA is administered only to ELLs and the FCAT is a criterion referenced test; and,

WHEREAS, the determination of Ell’s academic achievement, in one of the few programs in the state governed by the terms of a federal court order, must have the national dimension afforded only by a nationally normed test; and,

WHEREAS,  the 1990 version of 6A-6.0901 (1) defined Limited English Proficient Student as a student whose home language is one other than English as determined by a home language survey and whose English aural comprehension, speaking, reading, or writing proficiency is below the average English proficiency level of English speaking students of the same age and grade; and,

WHEREAS,  the purpose of a norm referenced test is to compare a student’s achievement with that of a sample of students of similar age and grade from the general school population who make up the norming group, a comparison that can only be made through a normed test; and,  

WHEREAS, 6A-6.0903 (2) (a) 2a proposes that only one measure, the CELLA, be used as the basis for exit decisions for students in grades K-2; and,

WHEREAS, use of only one measure conflicts with national assessment standards; and,

WHEREAS,  proposed rule 6A-6.09021 masks information by setting cut scores by grade clusters for the CELLA, not on a precise grade by grade basis as is done for the FCAT, despite Board Member Shanahan’s April  2008 admonition that ELLs should be treated in the same way as other students in terms of testing policies; and,

WHEREAS, the proposed rules perpetuate the use of the CELLA despite concerns voiced by teachers, counselors, and administrators who find that the CELLA is not appropriate for their ELLs and that validity of the test is threatened because only one form of the test has been developed for each grade; and,

WHEREAS, changes to the rules on eligibility criteria for ESOL services should not take place before baseline information is available on outcomes from full implementation of the Consent Decree; yet annual reports on the multiple monitoring and evaluation tasks detailed in Sections III, V, and VI of the Consent Decree tasks have not been published; and,  

WHEREAS, among the proposed rules are those that distort, ignore, or contravene the requirements of the Decree and pay no more than lip service to psychometric principles;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that LULAC Florida urges the State Board of Education to postpone consideration of the proposed ESOL rules to provide time for the FDOE to formulate rules that are clear, unambiguous, and conform with legal and professional standards that ensure equal opportunity for the state’s quarter million ELL students. It is not in the best interest ofFloridato walk backward on the progress made in the area of effective ESOL services.

http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rules-on-identification-and-entry-6a-6-0902-1-c-2-a-and-2-extension-of-service-6a-6-09022-1-2-3-program-exit-6a-6-0903-1-2-2/

Feel free to share this summary with parents, community groups, teachers, and other interested stakeholders and please make plans to attend this important meeting inOrlandoon August 4th.

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

LULAC Florida congratulates Hispanic CREO for focusing attention on the needs of Hispanic students

July 15th, 2011 | Conferences and Conventions | Comments Off

LULACFloridaResolution of Congratulations to Hispanic CREO for Sponsorship of a Forum on Hispanic Student Achievement on Friday, July 15, 2011, in Ft.Lauderdale

 

WHEREAS, the Florida Council of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is committed to improving the education of Hispanic students, including English Language Learners (ELLs; and,

WHEREAS, LULAC Florida is the first named plaintiff in LULAC v. Florida Board of Education, the source of the Consent Decree that protects the rights of ELLS; and,

WHEREAS, the latest reports from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data reveal the persistence for decades of a national Hispanic achievement gap of two grade levels, rising to a gap of four grade levels for Hispanic ELLs; and,

WHEREAS, Florida’s ELLs continue to need additional support to meet requirements and standards, as only 3% of Florida’s 2010 10th Grade ELLs students achieved at Level 3 on the FCAT Reading test; and,

WHEREAS, proposed state rules affecting the civil rights and opportunities for achievement by Hispanic students will be considered at the meeting of the State Board of Education currently scheduled for Aug. 16th in Tallahassee; and

WHEREAS, LULAC Florida urges all advocates to attend that meeting and to review LULAC Resolutions on the proposed rules posted at http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rules-on-identification-and-entry-6a-6-0902-1-c-2-a-and-2-extension-of-service-6a-6-09022-1-2-3-program-exit-6a-6-0903-1-2-2/  and  http://esolfl.blog.com/lulac-florida-resolution-on-proposed-esol-rule-on-parent-notification-6a-6-0902-3-d/ ; and,

WHEREAS, Florida Commissioner of Education Gerard Robinson’s participation in this conference demonstrates his interest in increasing Hispanic achievement and is appreciated; and,

WHEREAS, StudentsFirst’s support for the Dream Act is welcomed; and,

WHEREAS, the goals and interests of LULAC Florida and Hispanic CREO overlap in several areas, such as support for parental involvement, shared traditions of great respect for teachers as the “second mothers”, insistence on reforms leading to increased academic achievement for Hispanic students, and encouragement of options within public education such as Dual Language, International Baccalaureate, Magnet, and Innovative Schools;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that LULAC Florida congratulates Hispanic CREO for focusing attention on the needs of Hispanic students and for its sponsorship of a Forum on Hispanic Student Achievement on Friday, July 15, 2011, inFt.Lauderdale.

Submitted By                                                               Approved by

______________________                                        ___________________________

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

The State and Local Funding Flexibility Act (H.R. 2445): Action Alert from LULAC and NCLR.

July 8th, 2011 | The State and Local Flexibility Act (HR 2445) | Comments Off

Excerpts  from a  sample letter from LULAC,  below, describes the serious flaws in the State and Local Funding Flexibility Act (H.R. 2445). See also NCLR’s Action Alert, NCLR Condemns Legislative Proposal to Back Down Civil Rights Protections in Education,  at http://www.nclr.org/index.php/about_us/news/blog/nclr_condemns_legislative_proposal_to_back_down_civil_rights_protections_in_education/
 
Your action is needed to ensure that there is  no interruption of targeted assistance to our most vulnerable students.

 We need to act before Wednesday, according to the  alert. Here is contact information for the Florida Congressional Delegation.  http://www.contactingthecongress.org/cgi-bin/newseek.cgi?site=ctc2011&state=fl

 See http://www.contactingthecongress.org/ for contact information for congressional delegations from all states.
 
Sample Letter

 July 8, 2011

 

Name

Office

Street Address

Washington, DC Zip Code

 

Member of Congress,

 

On behalf of ___________, I write to express our concerns about State and Local Funding Flexibility Act (H.R. 2445).

We believe that a bipartisan, comprehensive reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) is the best approach to strengthen the law addressing concerns of stakeholders nationwide.With a national graduation rate of only 72% and an on-time graduation rate for students of color and Native students hovering around 50%, Congress must target its efforts and polices toward strategies that are most likely to strengthen academic performance and graduation rates for all students. In Florida, only 58% of Hispanic students graduate on time with a 4 year diploma.  We fear that the State and Local Funding Flexibility Act provides flexibility for flexibility’s sake, potentially at the cost of low-income students of color and Native students.

 Since 1965, federal education policy has focused on students who are disadvantaged. The State and Local Funding Flexibility Act could have the opposite effect, by allowing funds targeting low-income and other disadvantaged students for specific purposes to be used for other purposes.Recent data from the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Education sheds light on the ongoing educational disparities happening across the country. For instance, schools serving mostly African-American students are twice as likely to have teachers with just one or two years of experience,and English Language learner (ELLs) students make up 6 percent of the high school population, but are 15 percent of the students for whom algebra is the highest-level math course taken; these realities are unacceptable.[1] As of  2007-2008 Florida had the third-highest percentage of ELLs in the country with 8.8%; over the last ten years there has been a 21.1% increase in ELLs. We need to continue to provide more, not less, to the students who need it the most. Further, the degree of flexibility proposed by this legislation jeopardizes the quality and quantity of services to disadvantaged students.

 We oppose this bill for the following reasons:  

·       Support for English language learners and Native students is  jeopardized.Funding and support for Title III, Title VII, and other funding for English language learners and Native students has to date not been adequate to ensure these students succeed. Nothing in the bill ensures that English language learners and Native students will receive at least the same amount of high-quality services as they do now or increased services, in fact, it could lead to fewer and lower-quality services to these students.
 
·       Continuation of  Title I  jeopardized.  The bill allows school districts to ignore the requirement to fund Title I schools (section 1113(c)). 
 
·       Parents and students are left out. By focusing on providing flexibility in how to use program funds for the adults in systems that are failing students and families already, this bill ignores the pressing needs of the most disadvantaged students and their parents. Rather than focusing on flexible uses of funds, Congress should be putting the needs of parents and students front and center by holding the adults in the system accountable for improving results for all children through , effective teachers, parent engagement, high standards, and adequate supports to ensure success.

 While some flexibility may be appropriate, it should not turn back the clock on progress made over the last 10 years, and any flexibility given should not be at the expense of disadvantaged children and their academic achievement. Instead of providing states and districts with flexibility that endangers quality and outcomes for disadvantaged children, the federal government should support state efforts to construct and implement a system of interventions that will be effective in helping schools significantly and rapidly improve learning conditions and outcomes for all students.

 Thank you for your consideration of these concerns.If you have questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact FILL IN CONTACT INFO HERE.

 

Sincerely,


[1]National Journal Education.Dispiriting Numbers on Education, Civil Rights.Accessed July 6, 2011.http://education.nationaljournal.com/2011/07/dispiriting-numbers-on-educati.php

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Save Our Schools March & National Call to Action! July 28-31, 2011 in Washington, D.C. and around the country.

July 7th, 2011 | advocacy | Comments Off

What affects public education affects English Language Learners. Therefore, the community of support for ELLs will be interested in the following announcement on the Save Our Schools March. Go to http://www.saveourschoolsmarch.org/  for additional information.

Update: Amtrak will offer a 10% discount off the best available  rail fare to ( Washington , DC ) between (July 25, 2011 – August 03, 2011).  To book a reservation call: Amtrak at 1 (800) 872-7245.    Ask for: Save Our Schools March Convention Rate-X08H – 929.

Save Our Schools March & National Call to Action!

July 28-31, 2011 in Washington, D.C. and around the country

We’re putting the Public back in public schools!

We, a collection of people from all walks of life and every corner of this nation, embody a mixture of ideas and opinions regarding how we can improve educational opportunities for all children. We stand united by one belief – it’s time for teachers and parents to organize and reclaim control of our schools.

As concerned citizens, we demand an end to the destructive policies and rhetoric that have eroded confidence in our public schools, demoralized teachers, and reduced the education of too many of our children to nothing more than test preparation.

A well-educated society is essential to the future of the United States of America. Our students must have access to a fully funded, world-class public education system, and it is our responsibility to hold our government accountable for providing the means to achieve it. Please join us!

July 30: DC Rally & March

The rally will officially begin at noon at the Ellipse, but arrive early to enjoy performances, art, and more!

At noon, Diane Ravitch, Jonathan Kozol, José Vilson, Deborah Meier, Monty Neill, and other speakers, musicians, performance poets, and more will encourage, educate, and support this movement and the Save Our Schools March demands.

At 1:30 p.m., we will march to the White House, where the demands will be read, we’ll demonstrate, and engage in a call for continued action to reclaim schools as places of learning, joy, and democracy.

If you can’t make it to DC, follow the site to find out more about ways to participate in or plan actions in your local area!

*   *   *

Visit the Events section to learn more about what is being planned. Follow the March on Twitter and causes.com to stay up-to-date; learn, plan and network on our discussion boards; and explore the rest of the site to get informed and GET INVOLVED!

xxx
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Proposed ESOL Eligibility Rules on the August 16 agenda of the State Board of Education

June 28th, 2011 | Entry and Exit Criteria | Comments Off

The August 16, 2011 State Board meeting will be held at the  Knott Building, 111 W. St. Augustine Rd.
Room 212, Tallahassee, Florida. Proposed ESOL eligibility rules are on the agenda for that meeting. Meeting locations and agendas are subject to change. Check the state board site  for the latest information at https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx  and http://www.fldoe.org/board/meetings/  .

For a copy of the proposed rules, LULAC  Florida resolutions on those rules,  statements by the Florida Association of Bilingual and ESOL Supervisors (FABES), members of Sunshine State TESOL of Florida and the Bilingual Association of Florida, the Spanish American League Against Discrimination (SALAD), the National Congress for Puerto Rican Rights (NCPRR),  and scores of other comments on the rules, see http://esolfl.blog.com/current-status-of-proposed-esol-eligibility-rules-june-16-2011/ .

The proposed rules have generated controversy because they determine who will receive ESOL services and for how long  and because they impinge on the civil rights of a quarter million Florida English Language Learners.

Please make plans to attend this important meeting.

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) to Hold Florida State Convention in Tampa on May 28th and 29th

May 18th, 2011 | Conferences and Conventions | Comments Off

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE    

 

May 16, 2011                                                                                     

League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) to Hold

Florida State Convention in Tampa on May 28th and 29th

 

TAMPA, FL – On May 28th and 29th, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) will hold its annual Florida State Convention at the Embassy Suites Brandon, located at 10220 Palm River Road in Tampa. All Saturday workshops are free and open to the public. The Convention will conclude on Sunday after the meeting of the LULAC General Assembly.

The 2-day event, themed: “Leading Change: Empowering Hispanics in the 21st Century,” will feature workshops on demographic trends and redistricting (presented by Latino Justice PRLDF); hate crimes (presented by the Federal Bureau of Investigations); housing (presented by the National LULAC Housing Commission) and a presentation by the American Cancer Society. 

Luncheon speakers include Ms. Susan Valdes, Hillsborough School District Board member. Key note speaker Ingrid Robledo is  noted Miami-Dade educator and Winner of the “Everyday Heroes Award”.  Elected officials have been invited to speak at the Gala Dinner event.  Senator Bill Nelson has been invited to do the keynote speech.

“Hispanics throughoutFloridacontinue to face touch challenges,” said Jose Fernandez, State Director for LULAC Florida. “LULAC is aimed at advancing the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, health and civil rights for Hispanics living inFlorida. Conventions like these help us recruit members and spread our message through all parts of the state.”

The League of United American Citizens (LULAC) is the largest civil rights advocacy organization in the United States.  Founded in 1929, LULAC’s mission is to advance the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, housing, health and civil rights of the Hispanic population of the United States.

The 2011 Florida LULAC Convention is sponsored by the Florida Education Association, Coca-Cola, Hispanic CREO, the American Cancer Society and others.  

CONTACT:       Lydia Medrano 813-494-3472      

                                  Jose   Fernandez  407-394-6848

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Proposed ESOL Rules will probably be presented to the State Board of Education on June 21, 2011, in Tampa or Orlando

May 2nd, 2011 | Entry and Exit Criteria | Comments Off

6A-6.0902 Requirements for Identification, Eligibility, and Programmatic Assessments of English Language Learners.

(1) Requirements for identification. Each student shall be surveyed upon initial  registration in a Florida public school. The survey shall contain the following questions:

(a) Is a language other than English used in the home?

(b) Did the student have a first language other than English?

(c) Does the student most frequently speak a language other than English?

The questions may appear on a school’s registration form or a separate survey form. The home language and the national origin of each student shall also be collected and retained in the district’s data system. Affirmative responses to question (b) or (c), or both requires that the student be placed in the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program until completion of the eligibility assessment. A student for whom the only affirmative response to the survey is question (a) does not need to be placed in the ESOL program pending assessment.

(2) Assessment to determine eligibility for appropriate services and funding.

(a) Each student who responded “yes” to any question on the home language survey shall be assessed to determine if the student is limited English proficient based on one of the standards set forth in this subsection. Any student identified by the home language survey who also meets one of the standards in subparagraphs (2)(a)1., 2. and 3. of this rule shall be classified as an English Language Learner (ELL) and shall receive appropriate instruction and funding as specified in Sections 1003.56 and 1011.62, F.S.

1. Any student in grades K through 12 who scores within the limited English proficient range as determined by the publisher’s standards on a Department of Education approved aural and oral language proficiency test or scores below the English proficient level on a Department of Education approved assessment in listening and speaking, shall be classified as an English Language Learner and shall be provided appropriate services. Assessment of each student’s aural and oral proficiency or listening and speaking should be completed as soon as possible after the student’s initial enrollment but not later than twenty (20) school days after the student’s enrollment unless documented in the following manner:

a. The documentation shall include the reason for the delay, evidence that the student is accorded the programming required for ELLs pending the delay, and a specific timetable for completing the assessment.

b. This documentation shall be mailed to the parents in the language they understand, unless clearly not feasible no later than eight (8) weeks after initial enrollment.

c. A copy shall be retained in the student’s files for a minimum of one (1) year.

Prospective kindergarten students may be assessed prior to enrollment during a kindergarten roundup evaluation so long as the assessment is given no earlier than May 1 of the calendar year the student will enroll.

2. Any student in grade 3 or above, who scores at or below 32nd percentile on reading comprehension and writing or language usage subtests of a nationally norm referenced test or scores below the English proficient level on a Department of Education approved assessment in reading and writing shall be classified as an English Language Learner and provided appropriate services. The assessment in reading and writing shall be completed as soon as possible after enrollment, but not later than twenty (20) school days after the aural and oral assessment or listening and speaking assessment.

3.  Upon request of a parent or teacher, a student who is determined not to be an English Language Learner or any student determined to be an English Language Learner based solely on one reading or writing assessment may be referred to an ELL Committee. The parents’ preference as to whether a student is determined to be an ELL or not to be an ELL shall be considered in the final decision. The ELL Committee may determine a student to be an English Language Learner or not to be an English Language Learner according to consideration of at least two (2) of the following criteria in addition to the test results from subparagraph (2)(a)1. or 2. of this rule:

a. Extent and nature of prior educational or academic experience, social experience, and a student interview;

b. Written recommendation and observation by current and previous instructional and supportive services staff;

c. Level of mastery of basic competencies or skills in English and heritage language according to appropriate local, state or national criterion-referenced standards;

d. Grades from the current or previous years; or

e. Test results other than subparagraph (2)(a)1. or 2. of this rule.

(b) Any determinations by the ELL Committee shall be contained in a written evaluation with a narrative description of the basis for the decision, which shall be placed in the ELL Student Plan. Such evaluations shall further set forth a plan, which will be implemented, to address the student’s English language needs.  The basis and nature of the ELL Committee’s recommendations shall be documented and maintained in the student’s file.      

  (c) An ELL Committee, after notification to the parent of the opportunity to participate in the meeting, shall conduct assessments referred to in subsections (2) and (3) of this rule and recommend an ELL Student Plan for such student.

(d)  An eligible student shall be reported for ESOL funding as specified in Section 1011.62, F.S.

(3) Programmatic Assessment.

(a) Each student determined to be an ELL shall be further assessed in academic areas so as to aid the student’s teacher in developing an appropriate instructional program.

(b) Each school district shall seek to document the prior schooling experience of ELLs by means of school records, transcripts and other evidence of educational experiences, and take such experiences into account in planning and providing appropriate instruction to such students. The school district shall award equal credit for courses taken in another country or a language other than English as they would the same courses taken in the United States or taken in English. For foreign-born students, the same district adopted policies regarding age appropriate placement shall be followed as are followed for students born in the United States. Should a school district use a placement test for determining appropriate grade or course placement, such assessment may not be based in whole or in part on the student’s English language proficiency. Students classified as ELLs shall be placed in the appropriate English for Speakers of Other Language or Language Arts through ESOL course and core subject area courses based on their assigned grade level.

(c) Any teacher, administrator, parent or parent’s designee may request the convening of an ELL Committee to review the student’s progress in attaining necessary subject area competencies or in overcoming persistent deficiencies in overall student performance. The ELL Committee may be reconvened at any time after a student has been served for a semester. The ELL Committee shall make recommendations for appropriate modifications in the student’s programming to address problems identified and shall document such modifications in the student’s ELL Student Plan.

(d) Parents have the right to have their child immediately removed from a language instruction educational program and to decline to enroll the student in such a program or choose other instructional options, if available. For purposes of this subparagraph, a “language instruction educational program” means an instruction course in which an ELL is placed for the purpose of developing and attaining English proficiency and which may make instructional use of both English and a child’s native language.  Nothing herein shall alter the duty of the district to provide highly qualified, duly certified or endorsed ESOL instructors in accordance with Rule 6A-1.09441, F.A.C., and the Course Code Directory and Instructional Personnel Assignments that is incorporated by reference therein.

Rulemaking  Authority 1001.02, 1003.56 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New 10-30-90, Amended 5-19-08,_______.

 

6A- 6.09021 Annual English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners (ELLs).

(1) All students classified as ELLs shall be assessed annually on the Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA).  A former ELL shall be assessed on CELLA during the school year in which the student exits from the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program.

(2) The CELLA shall be administered in accordance with standard written instructions appropriate for the examination. The written instructions will be issued by the Commissioner in the form of directions for administration and other written communications, and provided to school districts in sufficient time prior to each test.

(3) Provisions shall be made by school districts to administer the test to students who are absent on the designated testing dates according to directions specified by the Commissioner. The directions will be issued in the form of test administration manuals and other written communications, and provided to school districts in sufficient time prior to each test.

(4) Beginning with the effective date of this rule, the English language proficiency levels for Oral Skills, Writing, and Reading shall be as shown in the following tables:

Oral Skills (listening and speaking) grade cluster scale scores by English Language Proficiency Level
Grade

Clusters

Beginning Low Intermediate High Intermediate Proficient
K-2 495-632 633-649 650-672 673-755
3-5 560-675 676-697 698-719 720-805
6-8 565-680 681-712 713-732 733-830
9-12 580-681 682-713 714-738 739-835
Writing grade cluster scale scores by English Language Proficiency Level
Grade

Clusters

Beginning Low Intermediate High Intermediate Proficient
K-2 515-636 637-657 658-689 690-775
3-5 575-674 675-702 703-726 727-825
6-8 580-687 688-719 720-745 746-845
9-12 600-689 690-720 721-745 746-850
 

 

Reading grade cluster scale scores by English Language Proficiency Level

 

Grade

Clusters

 

Beginning

 

Low Intermediate

 

High Intermediate

 

Proficient

K-2 345-545 546-628 629-689 690-800
3-5 590-689 690-714 715-733 734-810
6-8 600-713 714-741 742-758 759-815
9-12 605-743 744-761 762-777 778-820

 

(5) The Commissioner shall annually review the CELLA performance data, the CELLA cut scores and the CELLA English proficiency levels. After consulting with experts in the fields of second language acquisition and assessment, and other stakeholder groups, the Commissioner shall recommend to the State Board of Education whether to maintain the existing cut scores and proficiency levels or make changes as may be necessary to the scores, proficiency levels or other requirements of this rule.

 

Rulemaking  Authority 1001.02, 1003.56 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56 FS. History–New _____

 

6A-6.09022  Extension of Services in English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Program

 

(1)  If a student is classified as an English Language Learner (ELL) after being enrolled in the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program for three (3) years, an ELL Committee shall be convened annually to re-evaluate the student’s progress towards English language proficiency.  The ELL Committee shall be convened no earlier than 30 days prior to the third anniversary of the student’s initial enrollment date, and no later than the anniversary date.  This process shall be completed annually thereafter. 

(2)  Any student being considered for extension of services shall be assessed on at least one Department-approved assessment instrument.  The assessment shall be administered no earlier than thirty (30) school days prior to the student’s anniversary date.  If the student’s anniversary date falls within the first two weeks of the school year, the student’s CELLA and applicable FCAT scores from the prior school year will suffice, and a more recent assessment is not required. The assessment must cover all four domains,  of listening, speaking, reading, and writing. 

(3)  The ELL Committee shall review the student’s academic record holistically and shall consider the assessment results from the assessment administered under item (2) above and the following criteria to determine whether the student is English language proficient:

a. Extent and nature of prior educational or academic experience, social experience, and a student interview;

b. Written recommendation and observation by current and previous instructional and supportive services staff;

c. Level of mastery of basic competencies or skills in English and/or heritage language according to appropriate state or national criterion-referenced standards, if any;

d. Grades from the current or previous years; and

e. Test results from tests other than the assessment according to (2) above.

(4)  If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is not English language proficient, ESOL services shall be extended.  If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is  English language proficient, the student shall be exited from the ESOL program.  The parents’ preference  as to whether the student is determined English language proficient or not English language proficient shall be considered in the final decision.  If an ELL Committee extends services, the Committee shall refer the student as necessary for appropriate remedial, compensatory, special and supportive service evaluations, and programs.     

(5)   The basis and nature of the ELL Committee’s decision on whether to extend or not to extend ESOL services shall be documented and maintained in the student’s file.

(6)   English Language Learners provided ESOL or heritage language instruction may be reported for funding in the Florida Educational Finance Program as specified in Section 1011.62, F.S. Lack of a student’s ESOL funding eligibility does not relieve a school district of any obligation it may have under state or federal law to continue to provide appropriate services to ELLs beyond the state ESOL program funding limits.

 

Rulemaking Authority 1001.02, 1003.56  FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New________.

 

Substantial rewording of Rule 6A-6.0903 Requirement for Classification, Reclassification, and Post Reclassification of English Language Learners, follows.  See Florida Administrative Code for present text.

 

6A-6.0903 Requirements for Exiting English Language Learners from the English for Speakers of Other Languages Program.

(1) Each student identified as an English Language Learner (ELL) shall continue to receive appropriate instruction until such time as the student is reclassified as English proficient and exited from the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Program. English proficiency shall be determined by assessing the student utilizing the annual Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA) and Florida Comprehensive Achievement Assessment (FCAT) in Reading, or by ELL Committee determination, in accordance with this rule. 

(2) Standards for Student Exit from the ESOL Program. 

(a)   An ELL shall be determined English language proficient and exited from the ESOL program upon obtaining:

1.    scores of “Proficient” at the applicable grade level on each CELLA subtest administered annually pursuant to Rule 6A-6.9021; and    

2.    a.  For students in grades K-2, CELLA is the only assessment required and FCAT is not required;

b.  For students in grades 3 – 9, an achievement level of 3 or higher on applicable Florida Comprehensive Achievement Test (FCAT) in Reading;

c.  For students in grades 10 – 12, a score on the 10th grade FCAT in Reading sufficient to meet applicable graduation requirements, or an equivalent concordant score pursuant to section 1008.22, Florida Statutes.

 

Upon receipt of the CELLA and FCAT scores, schools shall exit students no later than the last school day of the school year. If CELLA or FCAT Reading scores are received after the end of the school year, schools shall exit students within two weeks after the beginning of the next school year and shall use the last day of the school year in which the FCAT Reading examination was administered as the exit date.

(b)   1.    Notwithstanding a student’s CELLA scores, upon the request of a student’s teacher, counselor, administrator, or parent, a student who has been classified as an ELL and enrolled in an English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program may be re-evaluated for English language proficiency by convening an ELL Committee at any time.

2.    Any student being considered for exit by an ELL Committee shall be assessed on at least one Department-approved assessment instrument, which shall be administered no earlier than thirty (30) school days prior to the ELL Committee’s determination regarding exit.  The assessment must cover all four domains, including listening, speaking, reading, and writing. 

3.    The ELL Committee shall review the student’s academic record holistically and shall consider the assessment results from the assessment administered under item (2)(b)2. above and the following criteria to determine whether the student is English language proficient:

        a.     Extent and nature of prior educational or academic experience, social experience, and a student interview;

        b.     Written recommendation and observation by current and previous instructional and supportive services staff;

        c.     Level of mastery of basic competencies or skills in English and/or heritage language according to appropriate state or national criterion-referenced standards, if any;

        d.     Grades from the current or previous years; and

        e.     Test results from tests other than the assessment according to (2)(b)2. above.

4.    If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is English language proficient, the student shall be exited from the program.  If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is not English language proficient, the student shall remain enrolled in the program.  The parents’ preference as to whether a student is determined English language proficient or not English language proficient shall be considered in the final decision. 

5.    The ELL Committee shall document the records reviewed by the Committee, which must include each of the criteria under (2)(b)3., above.  The Committee’s decision shall be supported by at least two of the criteria established in subparagraph (2)(b)3., above, and the supporting criteria shall be documented in the student’s file.

 

Rulemaking Specific Authority 1001.02, 1003.56 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New 10-30-90, Amended 5-19-08, ______.

6A-6.09031  Post Reclassification of English Language Learners (ELLs)

 

(1) The performance of former ELLs shall be reviewed periodically to ensure parity of participation once they have been classified as English proficient. These reviews shall take place automatically at the student’s first report card and semi-annually during the first year after exiting, and at the end of the second year after exiting. Any consistent pattern of either under-performance on appropriate tests or failing grades shall result in the convening of an ELL Committee, after notice to the student’s parents of the opportunity to participate.  The ELL Committee shall  assess the student’s need for additional appropriate services, such as ESOL. Special consideration shall be given to any decline in grades and decline in test performance and to parent preference.

(2) The ELL Committee shall recommend an appropriate ELL Student Plan for students reclassified as ELLs. The basis and nature of such recommendations shall be documented and maintained in the student’s file. Any such plan shall be reevaluated for continued appropriateness after one year, and each year thereafter as necessary.

(3) Any student who is reclassified as an ELL shall be provided appropriate instruction on the basis of an annual extension pursuant to a documented determination of the student’s needs.

(4) A student who exits the program and is later reclassified as an ELL, may be reported in the ESOL program, as specified in Sections 1003.56 and 1011.62, F.S. Lack of a student’s ESOL funding eligibility does not relieve a school district of any obligation it may have under state or federal law to continue to provide appropriate services to ELLs beyond the state ESOL program funding limits.

 

Rulemaking Authority 1001.02, 1003.56 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New ____.

 

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Contact Information for Florida Legislators, 2011

April 27th, 2011 | advocacy | Comments Off

The last day of the regular session for the Florida Legislature is Friday, May 6.

NOW is the last chance to call the legislators to ask for full funding for our schools and students, K-Ph. D.,  health,  and library services; restoration of Foreign Languages to the Core Curriculum, and withdrawal of immigration bills.

Share your views on outsourcing teachers in virtual schools, pensions, union gag rules, privatizing health care and prisons, funding private schools with public funds,  and proposed  changes to the election laws, environmental protection rules, property insurance, and  the composition of Florida’s Supreme Court.

Your views on cutting corporate taxes during a time when all must pay a fair share to continue critically needed services are needed.

When enough people call, changes get made. Help make these positive changes happen with your calls. Encourage your friends to call too.

 

To find your own elected officials, go to http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/myrepresentative.aspx?Address=&City=&Zip5=33411&
 
Copied below is contact information for the 2011 Florida Legislators as compiled by Mary Berliau. It is also available at http://savefloridapublicschools.blogspot.com/2011/03/fl-senate-house-contact-info.html
  

2011 STATE LEGISLATORS EMAIL ADDRESSES & PHONE NUMBERS

STATE SENATORS

STATE REPRESENTATIVES

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

2011 Sunshine State Annual Conference Update in Jacksonville, FL

April 17th, 2011 | Conferences and Conventions | Comments Off

2011 Sunshine State Annual Conference Update in Jacksonville, FL

The early conference registration rate expires April 20th and our room block at the $89.00 rate at the Wyndham Hotel is filling up fast! Make your plans to join us and to take advantage of these discount opportunities.
http://www.wyndham.com/groupevents2011/jaxht_sunshine/main.wnt

www.wyndham.com

Welcome to the Wyndham Jacksonville Riverwalk! You can make your room reservation for the Sunshine State TESOLevent at the block rate by using the link below to reserve your room.
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Proposed Florida Rule 6A-6.0902 (Entry and Exit Criteria) as of April 2011

April 11th, 2011 | Entry and Exit Criteria | Comments Off

Proposed Rule 6A-6.0902 would determine eligibility criteria for entry into and exit from ESOL programs.  There is a form for submitting comments at https://app1.fldoe.org/rules/default.aspx (scroll down to 6A-6.0902).
 
   A summary of and links to 22 statements submitted last year on the prior version of the proposed ESOL rule are available at  http://esolfl.blog.com/summary-of-comments-and-statements-on-proposed-florida-state-board-of-education-rules-on-criteria-for-eligibility-for-esol/  To the extent that prior and current versions of the proposed rules are the same,  these same statements  may be useful now as background information for those submitting comments.  Links to the current rules and to the prior version of the proposed rule are also presented in the summary statement.
 

 FDOE’s Proposed Rule

Rule 6A-6.0902 is substantially rewritten to read (see Florida Administrative Code for present text):
6A-6.0902 Requirements for Identification, Eligibility, and Programmatic and Annual Assessments of English Language Learners.
(1) Requirements for identification. Each student shall be surveyed upon initial registration in a Florida public
school. The survey shall contain the following questions:
(a) Is a language other than English used in the home?

(b) Did the student have a first language other than English?

(c) Does the student most frequently speak a language other than English?

The questions may appear on a school’s registration form or a separate survey form. The home language and the

national origin of each student shall also be collected and retained in the district’s data system. Affirmative

responses to question paragraph (1)(b) or (c) of this rule, or both requires that the student be placed in the English

for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program until completion of the eligibility assessment. A student for

whom the only affirmative response to the survey is question in paragraph (1)(a) of this rule does not need to be

placed in the ESOL program pending oral/aural or listening/speaking assessment.

(2) Assessment to determine eligibility for appropriate services and funding.

(a) Each student who responded “yes” to any question on the home language survey shall be assessed to

determine if the student is limited English proficient based on one of the standards set forth in this subsection. Any

student identified by the home language survey who also meets one of the standards in subparagraphs (2)(a)1., 2.

and 3. of this rule shall be classified as an English Language Learner (ELL) and shall receive appropriate instruction

and funding as specified in Sections 1003.56 and 1011.62, Florida Statutes.

1. Any student in grades K through 12 who scores within the limited English proficient range as determined by

the publisher’s standards on a Department of Education approved aural and oral language proficiency test or scores

below the English proficient level on a Department of Education approved assessment in listening and speaking,

shall be classified as an English Language Learner and shall be provided appropriate services. Assessment of each

student’s aural and oral proficiency or listening and speaking should be completed as soon as possible after the

student’s initial enrollment but not later than twenty (20) school days after the student’s enrollment unless

documented in the following manner:

a. The documentation shall include the reason for the delay, evidence that the student is accorded the

programming required for ELLs pending the delay, and a specific timetable for completing the assessment.

b. This documentation shall be mailed to the parents in the language they understand, unless clearly not feasible,

no later than eight (8) weeks after initial enrollment.

c. A copy shall be retained in the student’s files for a minimum of one (1) year.

Prospective kindergarten students may be assessed prior to enrollment during a kindergarten roundup evaluation so

long as the assessment is given no earlier than May 1 of the calendar year the student will enroll.

2. Any student in grade 3 or above, who scores at or below 32nd percentile on reading comprehension and

writing or language usage subtests of a nationally norm referenced test or scores below the English proficient level

on a Department of Education approved assessment in reading and writing shall be classified as an English

Language Learner and provided appropriate services. The assessment in reading and writing shall be completed as

soon as possible after enrollment, but not later than twenty (20) school days after the aural and oral assessment or

listening and speaking assessment.

3. Upon request of a parent or teacher, a student not determined to be an ELL or a student determined to be an

ELL based solely on the reading and writing assessment may be referred to an ELL Committee. The parents’

preference as to whether a student is determined to be an ELL or not to be an ELL shall be considered in the final

decision. The ELL Committee may determine a student to be an English Language Learner or not to be an English

Language Learner according to consideration of at least two (2) of the following criteria in addition to the test results

from subparagraph (2)(a)1. or 2. of this rule:

a. Extent and nature of prior educational or academic experience, social experience, and a student interview;

b. Written recommendation and observation by current and previous instructional and supportive services staff;

c. Level of mastery of basic competencies or skills in English and heritage language according to appropriate,

state or national criterion-referenced standards;

d. Grades from the current or previous years; or

e. Test results other than subparagraph (2)(a)1. or 2. of this rule.

(b) Any determinations by the ELL Committee shall be contained in a written evaluation which shall be placed

in the ELL Student Plan. Such evaluations shall further set forth a plan, which will be implemented, to address the

student’s English language needs.

(c) An ELL Committee, after notification to the parent of the opportunity to participate in the meeting, shall

conduct assessments referred to in subsections (2) and (3) of this rule and recommend an ELL Student Plan for such

student.

(d) An eligible student shall be reported for ESOL funding as specified in Section 1011.62, F.S.

(3) Programmatic Assessment.

(a) Each student determined to be an ELL shall be further assessed in academic areas so as to aid the student’s

teacher in developing an appropriate instructional program.

(b) Each school district shall seek to document the prior schooling experience of ELLs by means of school

records, transcripts and other evidence of educational experiences, and take such experiences into account in

planning and providing appropriate instruction to such students. The school district shall award equal credit for

courses taken in another country or a language other than English as they would the same courses taken in the

United States or taken in English. For foreign-born students, the same district adopted policies regarding age

appropriate placement shall be followed as are followed for students born in the United States. Should a school

district use a placement test for determining appropriate grade or course placement, such assessment may not be

based in whole or in part on the student’s English language proficiency. Students classified as ELLs shall be placed

in the appropriate English for Speakers of Other Language or Language Arts through ESOL course and core subject

area courses based on their assigned grade level.

(c) Any teacher, administrator, parent or parent’s designee may request the convening of an ELL Committee to

review the student’s progress in attaining necessary subject area competencies or in overcoming persistent

deficiencies in overall student performance. The ELL Committee may be reconvened at any time after a student has

been served for a semester. The ELL Committee shall make recommendations for appropriate modifications in the

student’s programming to address problems identified and shall document such modifications in the student’s ELL

Student Plan.

(d) Parents have the right to have their child immediately removed from a language instruction educational

program and to decline to enroll the student in such a program or choose other instructional options, if available. For

purposes of this subparagraph, a “language instruction educational program” means an instruction course in which

an ELL is placed for the purpose of developing and attaining English proficiency and which may make instructional

use of both English and a child’s native language.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 1001.02 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New 10-30-90,

Amended 5-19-08,__________.

This is a new rule.
6A- 6.09021 Annual English Language Proficiency Assessment for English Language Learners (ELLs).
(1) All students classified as ELLs shall be assessed annually on the Comprehensive English Language
Learning Assessment (CELLA). A former ELL shall be assessed on CELLA during the school year in which the
student exits from the English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program.

(2) The CELLA shall be administered in accordance with standard written instructions appropriate for the

examination. The written instructions will be issued by the Commissioner in the form of directions for

administration and other written communications, and provided to school districts in sufficient time prior to each

test.

(3) Provisions shall be made by school districts to administer the test to students who are absent on the

designated testing dates according to directions specified by the Commissioner. The directions will be issued in the

form of test administration manuals and other written communications, and provided to school districts in sufficient

time prior to each test.

(4) Beginning with the effective date of this rule, the English language proficiency levels for Oral Skills,

Writing, and Reading shall be as shown in the following tables:

(a) Oral Skills (listening and speaking) grade cluster scale scores by English Language Proficiency Level

Grade

Clusters

Beginning Low Intermediate High Intermediate Proficient

K-2 495-632 633-649 650-672 673-755

3-5 560-675 676-697 698-719 720-805

6-8 565-680 681-712 713-732 733-830

9-12 580-681 682-713 714-738 739-835

(b) Writing grade cluster scale scores by English Language Proficiency Level

Grade

Clusters

Beginning Low Intermediate High Intermediate Proficient

K-2 515-636 637-657 658-689 690-775

Grade

Clusters

Beginning

Low Intermediate

High Intermediate

Proficient

K-2 345-545 546-628 629-689 690-800

3-5 590-689 690-714 715-733 734-810

6-8 600-713 714-741 742-758 759-815

9-12 605-743 744-761 762-777 778-820

(5) The Commissioner shall annually review the CELLA performance data, the CELLA cut scores and the

CELLA English proficiency levels. After consulting with experts in the fields of second language acquisition and

assessment, and other stakeholder groups, the Commissioner shall recommend to the State Board of Education

whether to maintain the existing cut scores and proficiency levels or make changes as may be necessary to the

scores, proficiency levels or other requirements of this rule.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 1001.02 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New _____.
 
 
 

3-5 575-674 675-702 703-726 727-825
6-8 580-687 688-719 720-745 746-845
9-12 600-689 690-720 721-745 746-850
(c) Reading grade cluster scale scores by English Language Proficiency Level

This is a new rule.
6A-6.09022 Extension of Services in English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Program
(1) If a student is classified as an English Language Learner (ELL) after being enrolled in the English for
Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) program for three (3) years, an ELL Committee shall be convened annually to
re-evaluate the student’s progress towards English language proficiency. The ELL Committee shall be convened no

earlier than thirty (30) days prior to the third anniversary of the student’s initial enrollment date, and no later than

the anniversary date. This process shall be completed annually thereafter.

(2) Any student being considered for extension of services shall be assessed on at least one Departmentapproved

assessment instrument. The assessment shall be administered no earlier than thirty (30) school days prior

to the student’s anniversary date. If the student’s anniversary date falls within the first two (2) weeks of the school

year, the student’s CELLA and applicable FCAT scores from the prior school year will suffice, and a more recent

assessment is not required. The assessment must cover all four (4) domains, of listening, speaking, reading, and

writing.

(3) The ELL Committee shall review the student’s academic record holistically and shall consider the

assessment results from the assessment administered under subsection (2) of this rule and the following criteria to

determine whether the student is English language proficient:

a. Extent and nature of prior educational or academic experience, social experience, and a student

interview;

b. Written recommendation and observation by current and previous instructional and supportive

services staff;

c. Level of mastery of basic competencies or skills in English and/or heritage language according to

appropriate state or national criterion-referenced standards, if any;

d. Grades from the current or previous years; and

e. Test results from tests other than the assessment according subsection (2) of this rule.

(4) If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is not English language proficient, ESOL

services shall be extended. If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is English language

proficient, the student shall be exited from the ESOL program. The parents’ preference as to whether the student is

determined English language proficient or not English language proficient shall be considered in the final decision.

If an ELL Committee extends services, the Committee shall refer the student as necessary, for appropriate remedial,

compensatory, special and supportive service evaluations, and programs.

(5) English Language Learners provided ESOL or heritage language instruction may be reported for funding in

the Florida Educational Finance Program as specified in Section 1011.62, Florida Statutes. Lack of a students’

ESOL funding eligibility does not relieve a school district of any obligation it may have under state or federal law to

continue to provide appropriate services to ELLs beyond the state ESOL program funding limits.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 1001.02 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New________.

10/18/2010
Rule 6A-6.0903 is substantially rewritten to read (see the Florida Administrative Weekly for present text).
6A-6.0903 Requirements for Classification, Reclassification, and Post Reclasification of English Language Learners
Exiting English Language Learners from the English for Speakers of Other Languages Program

.(1) Each student identified as an English Language Learner (ELL) shall continue to receive appropriate
instruction until such time as the student is reclassified as English proficient and exited from the English for
Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Program. English proficiency shall be determined by assessing the student
utilizing the annual Comprehensive English Language Learning Assessment (CELLA) and Florida Comprehensive
Achievement Assessment (FCAT) in Reading, or by ELL Committee determination, in accordance with this rule.

(2) Standards for Student Exit from the ESOL Program.

(a) An ELL shall be determined English language proficient and exited from the ESOL program upon

obtaining:

1. scores of “Proficient” at the applicable grade level on each CELLA subtest administered annually pursuant

to Rule 6A-6.9021, FAC.; and

2.a. For students in grades K-2, CELLA is the only assessment required and FCAT is not required;

b. For students in grades 3 – 9, a score of three (3) or higher on applicable Florida Comprehensive

Achievement Test (FCAT) in Reading;

c. For students in grades 10 – 12, a score on the 10

graduation requirements, or an equivalent concordant score pursuant to Section 1008.22, Florida Statutes.

Upon receipt of the CELLA and FCAT scores, schools shall exit students no later than the last school day of the

school year. If CELLA or FCAT Reading scores are received after the end of the school year, schools shall exit

students within two (2) weeks after the beginning of the next school year and shall use the last day of the school year

in which the FCAT Reading examination was administered as the exit date.

(b)1. Notwithstanding a student’s CELLA scores, upon the request of a student’s teacher, counselor,

administrator, or parent, a student who has been classified as an ELL and enrolled in an English for Speakers of

Other Languages (ESOL) program may be re-evaluated for English language proficiency by convening an ELL

Committee at any time.

2. Any student being considered for exit by an ELL Committee shall be assessed on at least one (1)

Department-approved assessment instrument, which shall be administered no earlier than thirty (30) school days

10/18/2010

prior to the ELL Committee’s determination regarding exit. The assessment must cover all four (4) domains,

including listening, speaking, reading, and writing.

3. The ELL Committee shall review the student’s academic record holistically and shall consider the

assessment results from the assessment administered pursuant to subparagraph (2)(b)2. of this rule and the following

criteria to determine whether the student is English language proficient:

a. Extent and nature of prior educational or academic experience, social experience, and a student

interview;

b. Written recommendation and observation by current and previous instructional and supportive

services staff;

c. Level of mastery of basic competencies or skills in English and/or heritage language according to

appropriate state or national criterion-referenced standards, if any;

d. Grades from the current or previous years; and

e. Test results from tests other than the assessment according subparagraph (2)(b)2. of this rule.

4. If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is English language proficient, the student

shall be exited from the program. If a majority of the ELL Committee determines that the student is not English

language proficient, the student shall remain enrolled in the program. The parents’ preference as to whether a

student is determined English language proficient or not English language proficient shall be considered in the final

decision.

5. The ELL Committee shall document the records reviewed by the Committee, which must include each of

the criteria under subparagraph (2)(b)3., of this rule. The Committee’s decision shall be supported by at least two

(2) of the criteria established in subparagraph (2)(b)2. of this rule, and the supporting criteria shall be documented in

the student’s file.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 1001.02 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New 10-30-90,

Amended 5-19-08, _________.

th grade FCAT in Reading sufficient to meet applicable

This is a new rule.
6A-6.09031 Post Reclassification of English Language Learners (ELLs)
(1) The performance of former ELLs shall be reviewed periodically to ensure parity of participation once they
have been classified as English proficient. These reviews shall take place automatically at the student’s first report
card and semi-annually during the first year after exiting, and at the end of the second year after exiting. Any

consistent pattern of either under-performance on appropriate tests or failing grades shall result in the convening of

an ELL Committee, after notice to the student’s parents of the opportunity to participate. The ELL Committee shall

assess the student’s need for additional appropriate services, such as ESOL. Special consideration shall be given to

any decline in grades and decline in test performance and to parent preference.

(2) The ELL Committee shall recommend an appropriate ELL Student Plan for students reclassified as ELLs.

The basis and nature of such recommendations shall be in writing and maintained in the student’s file. Any such

plan shall be reevaluated for continued appropriateness after one (1) year, and each year thereafter as necessary.

(3) Any student who is reclassified as an ELL shall be provided appropriate instruction on the basis of an annual

extension pursuant to a documented determination of the student’s needs.

(4) A student who exits the program and is later reclassified as an ELL, may be reported in the ESOL program,

as specified in Sections 1003.56 and 1011.62, Florida Statutes. Lack of a students’ ESOL funding eligibility does

not relieve a school district of any obligation it may have under state or federal law to continue to provide

appropriate services to ELLs beyond the state ESOL program funding limits.

Rulemaking Specific Authority 1001.02 FS. Law Implemented 1003.56, 1011.62 FS. History–New _____.
 
 
 
 

 

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

SB 1466, SB 2120, and HB 5101 would remove Foreign Languages from the list of Florida’s Core Curriculum subjects.

April 4th, 2011 | Foreign Languages | Comments Off

Status Update, April 8, 2011

There’s still discussion among lawmakers about exactly which classes are considered core curriculum under the new legislation. The foreign language issue and related matters, I’m told, will be dealt with in the Budget Conference Committee, whose members will be appointed by Thursday.

Most colleges require Foreign Language credit for admission. High school students are required to have two years of a foreign language to be eligible for a Bright Futures Scholarship. If schools could not afford to offer the courses, then the students who attend them would have this financial support for college eliminated. Additional arguments are summarized in the letter at the end of this posting.

Please keep calling your own legislators on restoration of Foreign Languages to the Core Curriculum un SB 2120, HB 5101, and any related bills.

Contact information is at the following link and is listed below.

 http://savefloridapublicschools.blogspot.com/2011/03/fl-senate-house-contact-info.html

April 4, 2011
This blog entry includes the date for next consideration of HB 5101 and SB 2120 (SPB 7128), contact information for legislators, the message to deliver, and a sample letter that summarizes the reasons for the request.
Date of next action
Update: HB 5101 and SB 2120 are  on the calendar for Wednesday, April 6th.
 
Contact Information and message
Please  call  “Erik Fresen” Erik.Fresen@myfloridahouse.gov , “Anitere Flores” flores.anitere.web@flsenate.gov ,  and your own Legislators  as soon as possible to request restoration  of Foreign Languages to the list of Core Curriculum subjects
 
Sen. Anitere Flores 850-487-5130
Rep. Erik Fresen 850) 488-4092
Contact information for all Representatives:

Contact Information for Senators

Sample Letter
.
Representative Fresen and Senator Flores:
 
SB 1466 and the House bill companion HB 5101 would remove Foreign Languages from the list of Core Curriculum subjects, currently included in that list under Florida Statutes Section 1003.01. Given the budget cuts facing the schools, these budget bills will become in effect policy matters. The number of schools able to afford Foreign Language classes will decrease dramatically. This will be especially true for the important upper levels of foreign language instruction where small classes are required not only because of class size requirements but also because fewer students elect them.
 
The negative impact of the proposed change would affect International Baccalaureate and International Studies schools as well, and threaten the continuation of offerings in Spanish for Spanish Speakers. Our national leadership role in the number of students who achieve high scores on Foreign Languages on the AP and other tests  would disappear,
 
In a state that depends as heavily of ours does on international trade and commerce, this is a counter productive move. This is also a state where there is great demand from parents for precisely what this provision would, in many cases, eliminate.
 
Please restore Foreign Languages to the list of Core Curriculum subjects in  SB 1466 and the House bill companion HB 5101.
 
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
 
Rosa Castro Feinberg, Ph. D.
Associate Professor (Retired)
Florida International University
Manager, Sunshine State TESOL Advocacy Mailing List
Chair, Education Committee, Florida Embassy LULAC Council #7220
Member, LULAC State Education Commission
International Director for Educational Affairs, LULAC International Embassy
http://esolfl.blog.com/
xxx
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

NOW is a good time to be sure everyone in your network is registered to vote.

April 2nd, 2011 | Elections | Comments Off

NOW, while current legislative issues are on our minds, is the time to be sure all those affected by legislative enactments will be registered to vote well in advance of the next elections. And who hasn’t been affected?  A stealth tax is proposed for all public employees who will have to pay for pension benefits. Bills are pending that would raise tuition for college and university students and increase  phone and other utility bills and property insurance rates, Other bills well on their way to legislative approval would slash benefits for schools, the medically needy, and disabled adults, and push seniors, children, and other medicaid recipients into managed care programs with reduced services. Florida’s Prepaid College and Bright Futures plans are in jeopardy. The future of public hospitals appears uncertain.
 
NOW is the time to urge your friends, neighbors, family members, and colleagues to register to vote and to fill out an application for an absentee ballot.
 
If each of us starts distributing via email or in person the documents from the following links, we will be well on our way to ensuring a larger turnout for the next elections and we will be sure that persons affected by our current policy makers’ actions are among the electorate.
 
Voter registration instructions, form, and addresses for County Supervisors of Elections,  in English
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/pdf/webappform.pdf
 
Voter registration instructions,  form, and addresses for County Supervisors of Elections,in Spanish
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/pdf/webappform_spanish.pdf
 
Forms for absentee voting requests are not currently available online. They can be requested from your County Supervisor of Elections. Contact information for the Supervisors of Elections are listed  at the two links listed above.
 
NOW is a good time to be sure everyone in your network is registered to vote.
xxx
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

April 2, 2011,PTA TOWN HALL MEETING, Miami-Dade County Council of PTAs/PTSAs

March 31st, 2011 | For Parents and Other Advocates | Comments Off

Announcement from the Miami-Dade County Council of PTAs/PTSAs

April 2, 2011

PTA TOWN HALL MEETING

Everyone is invited to join our town hall meeting featuring National President Charles J. (Chuck) Saylors and Florida PTA President Jean Hovey as we discuss the state of PTA and the role each of us can play to ensure PTA’s relevancy to today’s families.

Booker T. Washington Senior High School

1200 NW 6th Avenue

Miami, FL 33136

Reception/Registration – 10:00 am – 11:00 am

Panel discussion will start promptly at 11:00 am followed by a question and answer session. 

 http://www.dccptaptsa.org/events

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Reminder to Advocates:Do not use public funds or publicly funded equipment or services for political purposes.

March 27th, 2011 | advocacy | Comments Off

If your message is about  elections, legislation, or funding, it’s political. Do not use public funds or publicly funded equipment or services for political purposes.

Do not mingle your personal and government/school/NPO email accounts on a government/NPO funded computer.

Do not use your school/college/NPO email account for political purposes.

Do not use your school/college/NPO cell phone for political purposes.

Do not use your school/college/NPO land line for political purposes.

Do not make calls or send emails during your scheduled work time.

Did I forget anything?

See what can happen even to the most careful.

Using the Open Records Law to Intimidate Critics

http://scholarcitizen.williamcronon.net/2011/03/24/open-records-attack-on-academic-freedom/

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

LULAC Florida State Director Jose A. Fernandez asks for veto of SB 736

March 22nd, 2011 | SB 736 | Comments Off

 

LULAC FLORIDA

March 21, 2011

The Honorable Rick Scott

Office of the Governor

The Capitol

400 South Monroe Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399

Emailed via http://www.flgov.com/contact-gov-scott/email-the-governor/

RE: SB 736

Dear Governor Scott:

You pledged to support a bill that would attract and retain the best teachers and make sure every classroom in Florida has a highly effective teacher. (http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/march/219581/Governor-Rick-Scott-applauds-passage-of-teacher-merit-pay-bill). You also pledged not to raise taxes.

According to Florida Department of Education Commissioner Eric Smith “The intent of the bill is to pay teachers who are rated as effective and highly effective more fairly.” (http://jaxkidsmatter.blogspot.com/2011/03/sb-736-gives-teachers-two-options.html). Florida Board of Education member John Padget of Key West believes the system will improve the overall quality of teachers. “We will make the teaching profession more attractive and financially highly rewarding for the best teachers,” said Padget  (http://keysnews.com/node/30560).

However, the legislature has failed to send you a bill that meets your expectations. Please veto it.

The bill before you uses an experimental, incompletely defined, value-added model. A number of research studies found that such models fail to reliably distinguish effective teachers from those who are not effective. Parents and teachers can not have confidence in a system whose structure ignores research findings and experts’ recommendations.

The bill before you requires testing data from tests for every course taught by any district. These tests have not yet been developed and no funding stream has been identified for the major part of the development work. Inevitably, local tax payers will end up paying the hefty bill (estimated at 2 billion dollars for start up costs and additional sums needed for test administration) for this unfinished work.

The bill before you does not provide funding for merit pay increases. Funding forecasts indicate even more school budget cuts are on the way.  On top of projected budget cuts, school districts will be paying for test development to implement SB 736. Therefore, there will be no local or state funds for financial incentives for many years to serve to attract and retain teachers in Florida’s schools.

The bill before you strips away constitutionally protected due process protections and collective bargaining rights from teachers. It subjects them to arbitrary dismissal with no explanation or recourse whatever their effectiveness status. Were it to be implemented, the impact of the bill would be to drive teachers from Florida’s schools, not to attract and retain them.

The League of Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is the largest and oldest Hispanic Organization in the United States. LULAC advances the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, health and civil rights of Hispanic Americans through community-based programs operating at more than 880 LULAC councils nationwide. The organization involves and serves all Hispanic nationality groups. Historically, LULAC has focused heavily on education, civil rights, and employment for Hispanics.

As the State Director of LULAC Florida, I note that almost a third of Florida’s students (692, 458) are Hispanic (Fall 2009 PK-12 Membership for the State, by Number and Percentage, for each Racial Category). There are 19, 480 Hispanic teachers employed in Florida’s schools (Teachers in Florida’s Public Schools by Race, Fall 2009).  According to data released Thursday by the U.S. Census, the share of Hispanics living in Florida grew by almost 60 percent over the past decade. Hispanics now make up 22.5 percent of Florida’s 18.8 million residents. The effect of the bill before you will have a negative impact on the children and educators from the communities served by LULAC Florida, and on all students and teachers. No one will benefit when implementation of the bill results in a transient education workforce. Our children deserve stability and continuity in their schooling experience.

For all these reasons, we ask you to veto SB 726.

Respectfully submitted,                            

 

                                                            Jose   A. Fernandez

 

                                                                          Jose A. Fernandez

                                                                          State Director

                                                                          LULAC Florida

                                                                          407-412-5189

                                                                          407-394-6848

                                                                          fflmgs@earthlink.net

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Florida requirements for promotion from the third grade and for high school graduation.

March 18th, 2011 | Bartleby Project | Comments Off

 
 This is a summary of current state requirements for promotion from the third grade and for high school graduation. Review the Pupil Progression Plan at your local school district to see if additional requirements apply.
 
Requirements for High School Graduation
 
According to Florida law, students must meet all academic requirements in order to receive a standard high school diploma from a public school. This means that students must take required courses, earn the correct number of credits, maintain a passing grade point average, and pass the Reading and Mathematics Sunshine State Standards (SSS) portion of the Grade 10 FCAT  
 
A senior can graduate by receiving a score comparable to the FCAT passing score on the ACT or SAT.    
 

If students have not received passing FCAT scores, they can enroll in a GED preparation course.  Students who meet these requirements, but do not pass the Grade 10 FCAT, will receive a Certificate of Completion, which is not equivalent to a standard high school diploma.
 See also  http://www.fldoe.org/BII/StudentPro/pdf/HSbrochure.pdf  Florida Department of Education 2010 
 
Seniors with a Certificate of Completion may enroll in any public community college in Florida by taking the Florida College Entry-Level Placement Test (CPT) to determine if they qualify to register for college credit courses or must take remedial courses to continue their college-preparatory studies.

June 2010 FDOE ASP—http://fcat.fldoe.org/pdf/fcatpass.pdf

 
 The statewide assessment program will be changing over the next several years to phase in new assessments aligned to Florida’s new expectations for student learning, known as the Next Generation Sunshine State Standards. These new assessments will be named FCAT 2.0 and Florida  End -of‐Course (EOC) Assessments.

 Details at http://www.fldoe.org/schools/pdf/sum-highschool.pdf

Requirements for Promotion from Grade to Grade 

Myth:
Students must “pass” the FCAT in each grade level to be promoted to the next grade.

 

Truth:
http://fcat.fldoe.org/pdf/myths-facts.pdf
 
 

Florida statutes specifically mention retention for students in Grade 3 who have not demonstrated sufficient reading skills, that is, those students who have scored in Level 1. These students must be provided additional instruction before being promoted to Grade 4. Each school board has some latitude in how it implements this requirement; however, school personnel must develop an individual academic improvement plan for each student who scores in Level 1. The district Pupil Progression Plan (available at local schools and school district offices) specifically outlines the grade-level promotional requirements.  
 
To promote a student using a portfolio as a good cause exemption, there must be evidence that demonstrates the student’s mastery of the Sunshine State Standards in reading equal to at least a Level 2 performance on the Grade 3 FCAT Reading. http://www.flbsi.org/pdf/Alternative%20Assessment%20Technical%20Assistance%2002-09.pdf Item B-1. 
 
xxx 

        

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

WeCount’s Immigrant Rights March, Saturday, March 19 · 5:00pm – 10:00pm

March 10th, 2011 | Immigration | Comments Off

Saturday, March 19 · 5:00pm – 10:00pm

Location
First United Methodist Church (Yellow Church…outside in the grass area)

622 N. Krome Ave.
Homestead, FL

Created By

More Info
” SOMOS HOMESTEAD! NOU SE HOMESTEAD! WE ARE HOMESTEAD!”

I would like to cordially invite you to WeCount’s Immigrant Rights March! We will be marching against racism and exclusion and in favor of love and respect for immigrants!

The march will be follow by a cultural celebration at the park! There will be speakers, music, food, clowns,…and everything that makes us strong and united!

Homestead is a beautiful, multicultural, multilingual community that needs YOUR support!

SEE YOU ON MARCH 19TH!

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Translation and interpretation services for English Language Learners and their parents

March 7th, 2011 | Translation and Interpretation | Comments Off

In an Education Week article (http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/03/03/23language.h30.html?tkn=LWWF5PvqQqkvivG1n3LWsDIi3%2FyL3XCOtY0I&cmp=clp-edweek) and blog entry (http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/learning-the-language/2011/03/advocacy_groups_push_for_bette.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LearningTheLanguage+%28Education+Week+Blog%3A+Learning+the+Language%29)
Mary Ann Zehr summarizes the requirements, recent enforcement activity by the  U.S. Department of Justice and by the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Education, and resources for school districts and advocacy groups.
 
Those resources include organizations such as  Multicultural Education,Training, and Advocacy (META), sample policies from New York and California, and documents such as a Toolkit  published by Bridging Refugee Youth and Children’s Services, an initiative by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops that receives funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Toolkit is available at http://www.brycs.org/documents/upload/Interpretation-Translation-FAQ.pdf .
 
For a summary of major federal legislative measures and court decisions protecting the rights of English Language Learners, see http://esolfl.blog.com/2010/09/10/federal-legislative-measures-and-court-decisions-protecting-the-rights-of-english-language-learners/  .
 
For instructions on how to file a complaint with the U. S. Department of Justice or the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, see http://esolfl.blog.com/2010/07/30/enforcement-of-federal-protections-against-national-origin-discrimination/  .
 
xxx
Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Call to Action: Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011, SB 736

February 21st, 2011 | SB 736 | Comments Off

  Call to Action: Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011 SB 736
Tallahassee

 9:00AM Senate Committee Hearing-412 Knott Bldg.

10:15AM House Committee Hearing
House Office Building 17 (basement)

SB 736 would remove due process for all new teachers and require  teacher evaluations based upon 50% of student test scores.Show your support for public education and school employees!

For more information contact: 1-855-897-3908
xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

Class-Size Fines: A message from the Florida PTA

February 15th, 2011 | Class Size Reduction | Comments Off

Funds to meet Florida class-size requirements were not provided. Fines for not meeting those requirements are therefore unfair as well as  damaging to our school children. Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla filed Senate Bill 776, co-sponsored by Representative Daphne Campbell House Bill 4141, to delete the portion of the 2002 constitutional amendment that imposes fines on districts that don’t meet the requirement.  Please take action as suggested below to help them correct this inequity. 

Rosie

$$$ CLASS-SIZE FINES $$$

  
Many Florida school districts face more than $31 million in fines for not meeting constitutionally mandated class-size restrictions of 18 students in kindergarten through third grade, 22 students in fourth through eighth grade and 25 students in high school. 
  
The Legislative Budget Commission may choose to pen
alize out-of-compliance districts by reducing their annual funding by over $31 million.  These fines coupled with the budget shortfalls our schools have faced will have great impact on our schools and in our classrooms.
  
Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla filed Senate Bill 776, co-sponsored by Representative Daphne Campbell House Bill 4141 to delete the portion of the 2002 constitutional amendment that imposes fines on districts that don’t meet the requirement. 
  
The Legislative Budget Commission will take up this matter at a February 15th meeting.
  
TAKE ACTION NOW
  
E-mail and/or call Senator Miguel Diaz de la Portilla at portilla.miguel.web@flsenate.gov or 850-487-5109; Senator Ellyn Setnor Bogdanoff at bogdanoff.ellyn.web@flsenate.gov or 850-850-487-5100; and Representative Daphne Campbell at daphne.campbell@myfloridahouse.gov or 850-488-4233 to thank them for saving our schools from facing these fines.
  
CONTACT THE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET COMMISSION and ask them to support these bills.
  
Representative Denise Grimsley (Alternating Chair)   denise.grimsley@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Senator JD Alexander (Alternating Chair) alexander.jd.web@flsenate.gov
  
Representative Charles Chestnut  charles.chestnut@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Senator Don Gaetz  gaetz.don.web@flsenate.gov
  
Representative Ed Hooper  ed.hooper@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Representative Mike Horner  mike.horner@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Representative Matt Hudson  matt.hudson@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Senator Joe Negron  Negron.joe.web@flsenate.gov
  
Senator Nan Rich  rich.nan.web@flsenate.gov
  
Senator Garrett Richter  richter.garrett.web@flsenate.gov
  
Representative Darryl Rouson  darryl.rouson@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Representative Robert Schenck  Robert.schenck@myfloridahouse.gov
  
Senator Gary Siplin  siplin.gary.web@flsenate.gov
  
Senator Stephen R. Wise  wise.stephen.web@flsenate.gov

 

  Information provided by Florida PTA

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter

MALDEF WINS NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION UPHOLDING VERDICT AGAINST ARIZONA VIGILANTE FOR ATTACK ON IMMIGRANTS

February 4th, 2011 | Immigration | Comments Off

MALDEF WINS NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION UPHOLDING VERDICT AGAINST ARIZONA VIGILANTE FOR ATTACK ON IMMIGRANTS

SAN ANTONIO, TX – Today, MALDEF welcomed the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Vicente v. Barnett, upholding an Arizona jury verdict against a vigilante rancher operating along the Arizona-Mexico border. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the jury’s decision that the vigilante was liable for assaulting a group of immigrants he found on public land. As a result of today’s ruling, the rancher will be forced to pay approximately $87,000 in damages.

The Ninth Circuit ruled that the rancher, Roger Barnett, was not entitled to claim self defense, because he admitted that none of the migrants he assaulted had threatened or attacked him. The Ninth Circuit also upheld the jury’s award of punitive damages against Barnett.

See http://maldef.org/immigration/index.html for details on the case.

The Ninth Circuit decision can be found at: http://maldef.org/assets/pdf/ninth_circuit_vicente_barnett.pdf

xxx

Share:
  • Add to favorites
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Meneame
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • MSN Reporter